Myanmar vs Zimbabwe: Share of neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus
Myanmar
88.0%
in 2022
Zimbabwe
89.0%
in 2022
Myanmar rank
65th
Zimbabwe rank
64th
Share of neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus over time
- Myanmar
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 89.0% against 88.0% in Myanmar, a difference of 1.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 23 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Myanmar ahead.
Myanmar ranks 65th and Zimbabwe ranks 64th of 106 countries.
Myanmar has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Myanmar | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 87.8% | 77.3% | 10.5% | Myanmar |
| 2010s | 89.7% | 76.0% | 13.7% | Myanmar |
| 2020s | 88.7% | 87.7% | 1.0% | Myanmar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus, Myanmar or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 89.0% against 88.0% in Myanmar as of 2022.
- What is the difference in share of neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus between Myanmar and Zimbabwe?
- 1.0%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Myanmar and Zimbabwe?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.
- How do Myanmar and Zimbabwe rank globally for share of neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus?
- Myanmar ranks 65th and Zimbabwe ranks 64th of 106 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization - Global Health Observatory (2026) – with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Share of neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.