Nepal vs Nicaragua: Share of neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus
Nepal
91.0%
in 2022
Nicaragua
92.0%
in 2022
Nepal rank
52nd
Nicaragua rank
49th
Share of neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus over time
- Nepal
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 92.0% against 91.0% in Nepal, a difference of 1.0%.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Nicaragua ahead.
Nepal ranks 52nd and Nicaragua ranks 49th of 106 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Nepal averaged higher in 1 and Nicaragua in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nepal | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 82.8% | 84.6% | 1.8% | Nicaragua |
| 2010s | 84.0% | 83.7% | 0.3% | Nepal |
| 2020s | 90.3% | 91.3% | 1.0% | Nicaragua |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus, Nepal or Nicaragua?
- Nicaragua, at 92.0% against 91.0% in Nepal as of 2022.
- What is the difference in share of neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus between Nepal and Nicaragua?
- 1.0%, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Nicaragua?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.
- How do Nepal and Nicaragua rank globally for share of neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus?
- Nepal ranks 52nd and Nicaragua ranks 49th of 106 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization - Global Health Observatory (2026) – with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Share of neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.