Chad vs South Sudan: Total population (thousands), per unit of GDP
Chad
0 thousands per US$ of GDP
in 2025
South Sudan
0 thousands per US$ of GDP
in 2015
Chad rank
16th
South Sudan rank
17th
Total population (thousands), per unit of GDP over time
- Chad
- South Sudan
How they compare
Chad currently reports 0 thousands per US$ of GDP against 0 thousands per US$ of GDP in South Sudan, a difference of 0 thousands per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Chad ahead.
Chad ranks 16th and South Sudan ranks 17th of 211 countries.
Chad has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 thousands per US$ of GDP | 0 thousands per US$ of GDP | 0 thousands per US$ of GDP | Chad |
| 2010s | 0 thousands per US$ of GDP | 0 thousands per US$ of GDP | 0 thousands per US$ of GDP | Chad |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total population (thousands), per unit of gdp, Chad or South Sudan?
- Chad, at 0 thousands per US$ of GDP against 0 thousands per US$ of GDP in South Sudan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in total population (thousands), per unit of gdp between Chad and South Sudan?
- 0 thousands per US$ of GDP, with Chad ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and South Sudan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2015.
- How do Chad and South Sudan rank globally for total population (thousands), per unit of gdp?
- Chad ranks 16th and South Sudan ranks 17th of 211 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total population (thousands), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total population (thousands) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.