What is the difference in total population (thousands), per unit of gdp between Jamaica and Marshall Islands?

0 thousands per US$ of GDP, with Jamaica ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Marshall Islands?

56 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2025.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Total population (thousands), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Jamaica vs Marshall Islands: Total population (thousands), per unit of GDP

Jamaica

0 thousands per US$ of GDP

in 2025

Marshall Islands

0 thousands per US$ of GDP

in 2025

Jamaica rank

101st

Marshall Islands rank

103rd

Total population (thousands), per unit of GDP over time

Jamaica
Marshall Islands

How they compare

Jamaica currently reports 0 thousands per US$ of GDP against 0 thousands per US$ of GDP in Marshall Islands, a difference of 0 thousands per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 56 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Marshall Islands ahead.

Jamaica ranks 101st and Marshall Islands ranks 103rd of 211 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Jamaica averaged higher in 1 and Marshall Islands in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Jamaica	Marshall Islands	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0 thousands per US$ of GDP	0 thousands per US$ of GDP	0 thousands per US$ of GDP	Marshall Islands
1980s	0 thousands per US$ of GDP	0 thousands per US$ of GDP	0 thousands per US$ of GDP	Marshall Islands
1990s	0 thousands per US$ of GDP	0 thousands per US$ of GDP	0 thousands per US$ of GDP	Marshall Islands
2000s	0 thousands per US$ of GDP	0 thousands per US$ of GDP	0 thousands per US$ of GDP	Marshall Islands
2010s	0 thousands per US$ of GDP	0 thousands per US$ of GDP	0 thousands per US$ of GDP	Marshall Islands
2020s	0 thousands per US$ of GDP	0 thousands per US$ of GDP	0 thousands per US$ of GDP	Jamaica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total population (thousands), per unit of gdp, Jamaica or Marshall Islands?: Jamaica, at 0 thousands per US$ of GDP against 0 thousands per US$ of GDP in Marshall Islands as of 2025.
What is the difference in total population (thousands), per unit of gdp between Jamaica and Marshall Islands?: 0 thousands per US$ of GDP, with Jamaica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Marshall Islands?: 56 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2025.
How do Jamaica and Marshall Islands rank globally for total population (thousands), per unit of gdp?: Jamaica ranks 101st and Marshall Islands ranks 103rd of 211 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Total population (thousands), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jamaica vs Marshall Islands: Total population (thousands), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://population.statizoid.com/compare/total-population-thousands-per-unit-of-gdp/jamaica/marshall-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://population.statizoid.com/compare/total-population-thousands-per-unit-of-gdp/jamaica/marshall-islands/">Jamaica vs Marshall Islands: Total population (thousands), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Total population (thousands), per unit of GDP
Unit: thousands per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 211 places, 10,370 data points, 1970–2025
Last refreshed: 28 August 2026

Total population (thousands) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.