Belize vs Sint Maarten (Dutch part): Urban and rural population 2050, annual growth rate

Belize
-0.0228 % change on previous year
in 2050
Sint Maarten (Dutch part)
0 % change on previous year
in 2050
Belize rank
66th
Sint Maarten (Dutch part) rank
64th

Urban and rural population 2050, annual growth rate over time

  • Belize
  • Sint Maarten (Dutch part)
-100-75-50-250195120002050

How they compare

Sint Maarten (Dutch part) currently reports 0 % change on previous year against -0.0228 % change on previous year in Belize, a difference of 0.0228 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 1956 it was Belize ahead.

Belize ranks 66th and Sint Maarten (Dutch part) ranks 64th of 234 countries.

Across the 8 decades both report, Belize averaged higher in 7 and Sint Maarten (Dutch part) in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belize Sint Maarten (Dutch part) Difference Ahead
1950s 2.99 % change on previous year -100 % change on previous year 102.99 % change on previous year Belize
1960s 2.9 % change on previous year -100 % change on previous year 102.9 % change on previous year Belize
1970s 2.86 % change on previous year -100 % change on previous year 102.86 % change on previous year Belize
1980s 3.51 % change on previous year -100 % change on previous year 103.51 % change on previous year Belize
1990s 1.98 % change on previous year -100 % change on previous year 101.98 % change on previous year Belize
2000s 3.3 % change on previous year -100 % change on previous year 103.3 % change on previous year Belize
2030s 0.9522 % change on previous year -100 % change on previous year 100.95 % change on previous year Belize
2050s -0.0228 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year 0.0228 % change on previous year Sint Maarten (Dutch part)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher urban and rural population 2050, annual growth rate, Belize or Sint Maarten (Dutch part)?
Sint Maarten (Dutch part), at 0 % change on previous year against -0.0228 % change on previous year in Belize as of 2050.
What is the difference in urban and rural population 2050, annual growth rate between Belize and Sint Maarten (Dutch part)?
0.0228 % change on previous year, with Sint Maarten (Dutch part) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Sint Maarten (Dutch part)?
8 years are reported by both, from 1956 to 2050.
How do Belize and Sint Maarten (Dutch part) rank globally for urban and rural population 2050, annual growth rate?
Belize ranks 66th and Sint Maarten (Dutch part) ranks 64th of 234 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Urban and rural population 2050, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belize vs Sint Maarten (Dutch part): Urban and rural population 2050, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://population.statizoid.com/compare/urban-and-rural-population-2050-annual-growth-rate/belize/sint-maarten-dutch-part/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://population.statizoid.com/compare/urban-and-rural-population-2050-annual-growth-rate/belize/sint-maarten-dutch-part/">Belize vs Sint Maarten (Dutch part): Urban and rural population 2050, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Urban and rural population 2050, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
235 places, 22,513 data points, 1951–2050
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Urban and rural population 2050. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.