Chile vs Iceland: Urban and rural population 2050, annual growth rate

Chile
-5.32 % change on previous year
in 2050
Iceland
-5.08 % change on previous year
in 2050
Chile rank
199th
Iceland rank
197th

Urban and rural population 2050, annual growth rate over time

  • Chile
  • Iceland
-505195120002050

How they compare

Iceland currently reports -5.08 % change on previous year against -5.32 % change on previous year in Chile, a difference of 0.24 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 21 times across 100 shared years of data; in 1951 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 199th and Iceland ranks 197th of 234 countries.

Across the 11 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 5 and Iceland in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Iceland Difference Ahead
1950s -0.5537 % change on previous year -1.48 % change on previous year 0.9281 % change on previous year Chile
1960s -0.6888 % change on previous year -1.19 % change on previous year 0.4986 % change on previous year Chile
1970s -1.44 % change on previous year -1.24 % change on previous year 0.2025 % change on previous year Iceland
1980s 0.5056 % change on previous year -1.19 % change on previous year 1.69 % change on previous year Chile
1990s -0.3927 % change on previous year -0.6422 % change on previous year 0.2496 % change on previous year Chile
2000s 0.3547 % change on previous year -0.7805 % change on previous year 1.14 % change on previous year Chile
2010s 0.2365 % change on previous year 0.3993 % change on previous year 0.1628 % change on previous year Iceland
2020s -1.15 % change on previous year 0.589 % change on previous year 1.74 % change on previous year Iceland
2030s -2.18 % change on previous year -1.22 % change on previous year 0.9616 % change on previous year Iceland
2040s -3.84 % change on previous year -3.29 % change on previous year 0.5411 % change on previous year Iceland
2050s -5.32 % change on previous year -5.08 % change on previous year 0.2378 % change on previous year Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher urban and rural population 2050, annual growth rate, Chile or Iceland?
Iceland, at -5.08 % change on previous year against -5.32 % change on previous year in Chile as of 2050.
What is the difference in urban and rural population 2050, annual growth rate between Chile and Iceland?
0.24 % change on previous year, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Iceland?
100 years are reported by both, from 1951 to 2050.
How do Chile and Iceland rank globally for urban and rural population 2050, annual growth rate?
Chile ranks 199th and Iceland ranks 197th of 234 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Urban and rural population 2050, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Iceland: Urban and rural population 2050, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://population.statizoid.com/compare/urban-and-rural-population-2050-annual-growth-rate/chile/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://population.statizoid.com/compare/urban-and-rural-population-2050-annual-growth-rate/chile/iceland/">Chile vs Iceland: Urban and rural population 2050, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Urban and rural population 2050, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
235 places, 22,513 data points, 1951–2050
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Urban and rural population 2050. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.