Denmark vs Libya: Share of population living in urban areas projected to 2050

Denmark
88.8%
in 2025
Libya
87.9%
in 2025
Denmark rank
45th
Libya rank
48th

Share of population living in urban areas projected to 2050 over time

  • Denmark
  • Libya
020406080100015122025

How they compare

Denmark currently reports 88.8% against 87.9% in Libya, a difference of 0.9%.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 108 shared years of data; in 1000 it was Libya ahead.

Denmark ranks 45th and Libya ranks 48th of 238 countries.

Across the 40 decades both report, Denmark averaged higher in 32 and Libya in 8.

Head to head by decade

Decade Denmark Libya Difference Ahead
1000s 0.1% 0.2% 0.1% Libya
1100s 0.2% 0.3% 0.1% Libya
1200s 0.3% 0.4% 0.2% Libya
1300s 0.4% 0.6% 0.2% Libya
1400s 0.6% 0.8% 0.2% Libya
1500s 0.9% 1.0% 0.1% Libya
1600s 1.4% 1.3% 0.1% Denmark
1700s 4.0% 1.8% 2.2% Denmark
1710s 5.4% 2.0% 3.4% Denmark
1720s 6.0% 2.2% 3.8% Denmark
1730s 6.7% 2.4% 4.3% Denmark
1740s 7.4% 2.6% 4.8% Denmark
1750s 8.3% 2.9% 5.4% Denmark
1760s 9.2% 3.2% 6.0% Denmark
1770s 10.2% 3.5% 6.7% Denmark
1780s 11.3% 3.8% 7.5% Denmark
1790s 12.6% 4.2% 8.4% Denmark
1800s 14.0% 4.6% 9.4% Denmark
1810s 15.6% 5.0% 10.6% Denmark
1820s 17.3% 5.5% 11.8% Denmark
1830s 19.2% 6.0% 13.2% Denmark
1840s 21.3% 6.6% 14.8% Denmark
1850s 23.7% 7.2% 16.5% Denmark
1860s 26.4% 7.9% 18.5% Denmark
1870s 29.3% 8.6% 20.6% Denmark
1880s 32.5% 9.5% 23.1% Denmark
1890s 36.2% 10.4% 25.8% Denmark
1900s 40.2% 11.3% 28.8% Denmark
1910s 44.6% 12.4% 32.2% Denmark
1920s 49.6% 13.6% 36.0% Denmark
1930s 55.1% 14.9% 40.2% Denmark
1940s 61.2% 16.3% 44.9% Denmark
1950s 71.0% 22.5% 48.5% Denmark
1960s 76.6% 28.2% 48.3% Denmark
1970s 81.8% 59.5% 22.4% Denmark
1980s 84.4% 75.5% 8.9% Denmark
1990s 85.0% 83.8% 1.2% Denmark
2000s 85.9% 87.9% 2.0% Libya
2010s 87.6% 87.9% 0.3% Libya
2020s 88.5% 87.9% 0.6% Denmark

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher share of population living in urban areas projected to 2050, Denmark or Libya?
Denmark, at 88.8% against 87.9% in Libya as of 2025.
What is the difference in share of population living in urban areas projected to 2050 between Denmark and Libya?
0.9%, with Denmark ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Libya?
108 years are reported by both, from 1000 to 2025.
How do Denmark and Libya rank globally for share of population living in urban areas projected to 2050?
Denmark ranks 45th and Libya ranks 48th of 238 countries.
Where does this data come from?
HYDE (2023); United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2025) – with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Share of population living in urban areas projected to 2050. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Denmark vs Libya: Share of population living in urban areas projected to 2050. Statizoid, drawing on HYDE (2023); United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2025) – with minor processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://population.statizoid.com/compare/urban-population-share-2050/denmark/libya/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://population.statizoid.com/compare/urban-population-share-2050/denmark/libya/">Denmark vs Libya: Share of population living in urban areas projected to 2050</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Share of population living in urban areas projected to 2050
Unit
%
Source
HYDE (2023); United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2025) – with minor processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
239 places, 24,444 data points, 1000–2025
Last refreshed

Share of the population living in urban areas, combining UN estimates with modeled historical data.