Guinea-Bissau vs Papua New Guinea: Using safely managed sanitation facilities: urban vs. rural population

Guinea-Bissau
30.4%
in 2024
Papua New Guinea
31.0%
in 2024
Guinea-Bissau rank
99th
Papua New Guinea rank
96th

Using safely managed sanitation facilities: urban vs. rural population over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Papua New Guinea
51015202530200020122024

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 31.0% against 30.4% in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 0.6%.

Across all 25 years both countries report, Papua New Guinea has been ahead every year.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 99th and Papua New Guinea ranks 96th of 124 countries.

Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
2000s 11.4% 30.2% 18.7% Papua New Guinea
2010s 22.4% 30.1% 7.7% Papua New Guinea
2020s 30.1% 30.8% 0.7% Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher using safely managed sanitation facilities: urban vs. rural population, Guinea-Bissau or Papua New Guinea?
Papua New Guinea, at 31.0% against 30.4% in Guinea-Bissau as of 2024.
What is the difference in using safely managed sanitation facilities: urban vs. rural population between Guinea-Bissau and Papua New Guinea?
0.6%, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Papua New Guinea?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do Guinea-Bissau and Papua New Guinea rank globally for using safely managed sanitation facilities: urban vs. rural population?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 99th and Papua New Guinea ranks 96th of 124 countries.
Where does this data come from?
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Using safely managed sanitation facilities: urban vs. rural population. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea-Bissau vs Papua New Guinea: Using safely managed sanitation facilities: urban vs. rural population. Statizoid, drawing on WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://population.statizoid.com/compare/urban-vs-rural-population-safely-managed-sanitation/guinea-bissau/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://population.statizoid.com/compare/urban-vs-rural-population-safely-managed-sanitation/guinea-bissau/papua-new-guinea/">Guinea-Bissau vs Papua New Guinea: Using safely managed sanitation facilities: urban vs. rural population</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Using safely managed sanitation facilities: urban vs. rural population
Unit
%
Source
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
124 places, 3,067 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed

Proportion of people using improved sanitation facilities that are not shared with other households and where excreta are safely disposed in situ or transported and treated off-site.