Lesotho vs Sao Tome and Principe: Using safely managed sanitation facilities: urban vs. rural population

Lesotho
34.7%
in 2024
Sao Tome and Principe
35.5%
in 2024
Lesotho rank
88th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
87th

Using safely managed sanitation facilities: urban vs. rural population over time

  • Lesotho
  • Sao Tome and Principe
010203040200020122024

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 35.5% against 34.7% in Lesotho, a difference of 0.8%.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Lesotho ahead.

Lesotho ranks 88th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 87th of 124 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Lesotho averaged higher in 2 and Sao Tome and Principe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lesotho Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
2000s 24.2% 21.0% 3.2% Lesotho
2010s 30.7% 29.8% 0.9% Lesotho
2020s 34.1% 35.3% 1.2% Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher using safely managed sanitation facilities: urban vs. rural population, Lesotho or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 35.5% against 34.7% in Lesotho as of 2024.
What is the difference in using safely managed sanitation facilities: urban vs. rural population between Lesotho and Sao Tome and Principe?
0.8%, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Sao Tome and Principe?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do Lesotho and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for using safely managed sanitation facilities: urban vs. rural population?
Lesotho ranks 88th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 87th of 124 countries.
Where does this data come from?
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Using safely managed sanitation facilities: urban vs. rural population. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lesotho vs Sao Tome and Principe: Using safely managed sanitation facilities: urban vs. rural population. Statizoid, drawing on WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://population.statizoid.com/compare/urban-vs-rural-population-safely-managed-sanitation/lesotho/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://population.statizoid.com/compare/urban-vs-rural-population-safely-managed-sanitation/lesotho/sao-tome-and-principe/">Lesotho vs Sao Tome and Principe: Using safely managed sanitation facilities: urban vs. rural population</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Using safely managed sanitation facilities: urban vs. rural population
Unit
%
Source
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
124 places, 3,067 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed

Proportion of people using improved sanitation facilities that are not shared with other households and where excreta are safely disposed in situ or transported and treated off-site.