Sao Tome and Principe vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Using safely managed sanitation facilities: urban vs. rural population

Sao Tome and Principe
35.5%
in 2024
Turks and Caicos Islands
33.3%
in 2024
Sao Tome and Principe rank
87th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
90th

Using safely managed sanitation facilities: urban vs. rural population over time

  • Sao Tome and Principe
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
010203040200020122024

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 35.5% against 33.3% in Turks and Caicos Islands, a difference of 2.2%.

That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 1.1 times Turks and Caicos Islands's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.

Sao Tome and Principe ranks 87th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 90th of 124 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Sao Tome and Principe averaged higher in 1 and Turks and Caicos Islands in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sao Tome and Principe Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
2010s 32.4% 33.3% 0.9% Turks and Caicos Islands
2020s 35.3% 33.3% 2.0% Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher using safely managed sanitation facilities: urban vs. rural population, Sao Tome and Principe or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 35.5% against 33.3% in Turks and Caicos Islands as of 2024.
What is the difference in using safely managed sanitation facilities: urban vs. rural population between Sao Tome and Principe and Turks and Caicos Islands?
2.2%, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sao Tome and Principe and Turks and Caicos Islands?
9 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2024.
How do Sao Tome and Principe and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for using safely managed sanitation facilities: urban vs. rural population?
Sao Tome and Principe ranks 87th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 90th of 124 countries.
Where does this data come from?
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Using safely managed sanitation facilities: urban vs. rural population. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sao Tome and Principe vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Using safely managed sanitation facilities: urban vs. rural population. Statizoid, drawing on WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://population.statizoid.com/compare/urban-vs-rural-population-safely-managed-sanitation/sao-tome-and-principe/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://population.statizoid.com/compare/urban-vs-rural-population-safely-managed-sanitation/sao-tome-and-principe/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Sao Tome and Principe vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Using safely managed sanitation facilities: urban vs. rural population</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Using safely managed sanitation facilities: urban vs. rural population
Unit
%
Source
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
124 places, 3,067 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed

Proportion of people using improved sanitation facilities that are not shared with other households and where excreta are safely disposed in situ or transported and treated off-site.