Hong Kong vs Rwanda: Urban vs rural population using at least basic sanitation … annual

Hong Kong
-0.1281 % change on previous year
in 2024
Rwanda
-0.4716 % change on previous year
in 2024
Hong Kong rank
180th
Rwanda rank
181st

Urban vs rural population using at least basic sanitation … annual over time

  • Hong Kong
  • Rwanda
-0.5-0.4-0.3-0.2-0.1-0200120122024

How they compare

Hong Kong currently reports -0.1281 % change on previous year against -0.4716 % change on previous year in Rwanda, a difference of 0.3435 % change on previous year.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Hong Kong has been ahead every year.

Hong Kong ranks 180th and Rwanda ranks 181st of 186 countries.

Hong Kong has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong Rwanda Difference Ahead
2000s -0.0835 % change on previous year -0.1533 % change on previous year 0.0698 % change on previous year Hong Kong
2010s -0.1266 % change on previous year -0.3063 % change on previous year 0.1797 % change on previous year Hong Kong
2020s -0.1278 % change on previous year -0.4354 % change on previous year 0.3077 % change on previous year Hong Kong

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher urban vs rural population using at least basic sanitation, annual, Hong Kong or Rwanda?
Hong Kong, at -0.1281 % change on previous year against -0.4716 % change on previous year in Rwanda as of 2024.
What is the difference in urban vs rural population using at least basic sanitation, annual between Hong Kong and Rwanda?
0.3435 % change on previous year, with Hong Kong ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Rwanda?
24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
How do Hong Kong and Rwanda rank globally for urban vs rural population using at least basic sanitation, annual?
Hong Kong ranks 180th and Rwanda ranks 181st of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Urban vs rural population using at least basic sanitation, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong vs Rwanda: Urban vs rural population using at least basic sanitation, annual. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 November 2026, from https://population.statizoid.com/compare/urban-vs-rural-population-using-at-least-basic-sanitation-annual-growth-rate/hong-kong-sar-china/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://population.statizoid.com/compare/urban-vs-rural-population-using-at-least-basic-sanitation-annual-growth-rate/hong-kong-sar-china/rwanda/">Hong Kong vs Rwanda: Urban vs rural population using at least basic sanitation, annual</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Urban vs rural population using at least basic sanitation, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
186 places, 4,370 data points, 2001–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Urban vs rural population using at least basic sanitation. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.