Assumptions for fertility rates by age, type of projection and NUTS 3 in Arr. Ath (NUTS 2016)
Arr. Ath (NUTS 2016): Assumptions for fertility rates by age, type of projection and NUTS 3 was 1.68 Number in 2100. ▲ Rising
Latest (2100)
1.68 Number
Change on year
up 0.2%
Rank
800th
of 1209 regions
All-time high
1.68 Number
in 2100
All-time low
1.45 Number
in 2020
Years of data
82
2019–2100
Assumptions for fertility rates by age, type of projection and NUTS 3 in Arr. Ath (NUTS 2016), 2019–2100
Source: Eurostat. Measured in Number.
Analysis
In 2100, assumptions for fertility rates by age, type of projection and nuts 3 in Arr. Ath (NUTS 2016) stood at 1.68 Number. That is the highest value across all 82 years on record.
That represents a change of up 0.2% on the previous year and up 1.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, assumptions for fertility rates by age, type of projection and nuts 3 in Arr. Ath (NUTS 2016) peaked at 1.68 Number in 2100 and was at its lowest, 1.45 Number, in 2020.
That places Arr. Ath (NUTS 2016) 800th out of 1209 regions with data for 2100, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 82 years of available data.
Assumptions for fertility rates by age, type of projection and NUTS 3 in Arr. Ath (NUTS 2016), year by year
| Year | Number | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 1.46 Number | — |
| 2020 | 1.45 Number | -1.1% |
| 2021 | 1.45 Number | +0.3% |
| 2022 | 1.46 Number | +0.3% |
| 2023 | 1.46 Number | +0.3% |
| 2024 | 1.46 Number | +0.3% |
| 2025 | 1.47 Number | +0.3% |
| 2026 | 1.47 Number | +0.2% |
| 2027 | 1.47 Number | +0.2% |
| 2028 | 1.48 Number | +0.2% |
| 2029 | 1.48 Number | +0.2% |
| 2030 | 1.48 Number | +0.2% |
| 2031 | 1.49 Number | +0.2% |
| 2032 | 1.49 Number | +0.2% |
| 2033 | 1.49 Number | +0.2% |
| 2034 | 1.5 Number | +0.2% |
| 2035 | 1.5 Number | +0.2% |
| 2036 | 1.5 Number | +0.2% |
| 2037 | 1.51 Number | +0.2% |
| 2038 | 1.51 Number | +0.2% |
| 2039 | 1.51 Number | +0.2% |
| 2040 | 1.52 Number | +0.2% |
| 2041 | 1.52 Number | +0.2% |
| 2042 | 1.52 Number | +0.2% |
| 2043 | 1.53 Number | +0.2% |
| 2044 | 1.53 Number | +0.2% |
| 2045 | 1.53 Number | +0.2% |
| 2046 | 1.53 Number | +0.2% |
| 2047 | 1.54 Number | +0.2% |
| 2048 | 1.54 Number | +0.2% |
| 2049 | 1.54 Number | +0.2% |
| 2050 | 1.55 Number | +0.2% |
| 2051 | 1.55 Number | +0.2% |
| 2052 | 1.55 Number | +0.2% |
| 2053 | 1.55 Number | +0.2% |
| 2054 | 1.56 Number | +0.2% |
| 2055 | 1.56 Number | +0.2% |
| 2056 | 1.56 Number | +0.2% |
| 2057 | 1.56 Number | +0.2% |
| 2058 | 1.57 Number | +0.2% |
| 2059 | 1.57 Number | +0.2% |
| 2060 | 1.57 Number | +0.2% |
| 2061 | 1.58 Number | +0.2% |
| 2062 | 1.58 Number | +0.2% |
| 2063 | 1.58 Number | +0.2% |
| 2064 | 1.58 Number | +0.2% |
| 2065 | 1.59 Number | +0.2% |
| 2066 | 1.59 Number | +0.2% |
| 2067 | 1.59 Number | +0.2% |
| 2068 | 1.59 Number | +0.2% |
| 2069 | 1.6 Number | +0.2% |
| 2070 | 1.6 Number | +0.2% |
| 2071 | 1.6 Number | +0.2% |
| 2072 | 1.6 Number | +0.2% |
| 2073 | 1.61 Number | +0.2% |
| 2074 | 1.61 Number | +0.2% |
| 2075 | 1.61 Number | +0.2% |
| 2076 | 1.61 Number | +0.2% |
| 2077 | 1.62 Number | +0.2% |
| 2078 | 1.62 Number | +0.2% |
| 2079 | 1.62 Number | +0.2% |
| 2080 | 1.63 Number | +0.2% |
| 2081 | 1.63 Number | +0.2% |
| 2082 | 1.63 Number | +0.2% |
| 2083 | 1.63 Number | +0.2% |
| 2084 | 1.64 Number | +0.2% |
| 2085 | 1.64 Number | +0.2% |
| 2086 | 1.64 Number | +0.2% |
| 2087 | 1.64 Number | +0.2% |
| 2088 | 1.65 Number | +0.2% |
| 2089 | 1.65 Number | +0.2% |
| 2090 | 1.65 Number | +0.2% |
| 2091 | 1.66 Number | +0.2% |
| 2092 | 1.66 Number | +0.2% |
| 2093 | 1.66 Number | +0.2% |
| 2094 | 1.66 Number | +0.2% |
| 2095 | 1.67 Number | +0.2% |
| 2096 | 1.67 Number | +0.2% |
| 2097 | 1.67 Number | +0.2% |
| 2098 | 1.68 Number | +0.2% |
| 2099 | 1.68 Number | +0.2% |
| 2100 | 1.68 Number | +0.2% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.46 Number | 1.46 Number | 1.46 Number | 1 |
| 2020s | 1.46 Number | 1.45 Number | 1.48 Number | 10 |
| 2030s | 1.5 Number | 1.48 Number | 1.51 Number | 10 |
| 2040s | 1.53 Number | 1.52 Number | 1.54 Number | 10 |
| 2050s | 1.56 Number | 1.55 Number | 1.57 Number | 10 |
| 2060s | 1.58 Number | 1.57 Number | 1.6 Number | 10 |
| 2070s | 1.61 Number | 1.6 Number | 1.62 Number | 10 |
| 2080s | 1.64 Number | 1.63 Number | 1.65 Number | 10 |
| 2090s | 1.67 Number | 1.65 Number | 1.68 Number | 10 |
| 2100s | 1.68 Number | 1.68 Number | 1.68 Number | 1 |
More population data for Arr. Ath (NUTS 2016)
- Demographic balances and indicators by type of projection and NUTS 3 -0.7165 % change on previous year (2100)
- Demographic balances and indicators by type of projection and NUTS 3 970 (2100)
- Live births (total) by NUTS 3 region 805 Number (2016)
- Population density by NUTS 3 region 178.1 Persons per square kilometre (2020)
- Population on 1 January by broad age group, sex and NUTS 3 region 86,593 Number (2016)
- Population change - Demographic balance and crude rates at regional 403 (2019)
- Population on 1 January by age group, sex and NUTS 3 region 87,388 Number (2020)
- Live births by age group of the mothers and NUTS 3 region 812 Number (2019)
Frequently asked questions
- What is assumptions for fertility rates by age, type of projection and nuts 3 in Arr. Ath (NUTS 2016)?
- Assumptions for fertility rates by age, type of projection and nuts 3 in Arr. Ath (NUTS 2016) was 1.68 Number in 2100, according to Eurostat.
- What is the highest assumptions for fertility rates by age, type of projection and nuts 3 recorded in Arr. Ath (NUTS 2016)?
- The highest recorded value was 1.68 Number in 2100.
- What is the lowest assumptions for fertility rates by age, type of projection and nuts 3 recorded in Arr. Ath (NUTS 2016)?
- The lowest recorded value was 1.45 Number in 2020.
- How does Arr. Ath (NUTS 2016) rank for assumptions for fertility rates by age, type of projection and nuts 3?
- Arr. Ath (NUTS 2016) ranks 800th out of 1209 regions with data for 2100.
- Is assumptions for fertility rates by age, type of projection and nuts 3 rising or falling in Arr. Ath (NUTS 2016)?
- Over the last ten years it is up 1.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Arr. Ath (NUTS 2016) data come from?
- The figures come from Eurostat, published as part of Assumptions for fertility rates by age, type of projection and NUTS 3 region. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 82 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Eurostat).