Assumptions for fertility rates by age, type of projection and NUTS 3 in Carbonia-Iglesias (NUTS 2016)
Carbonia-Iglesias (NUTS 2016): Assumptions for fertility rates by age, type of projection and NUTS 3 was 1.43 Number in 2100. ▲ Rising
Latest (2100)
1.43 Number
Change on year
up 0.5%
Rank
1206th
of 1209 regions
All-time high
1.43 Number
in 2100
All-time low
0.9054 Number
in 2019
Years of data
82
2019–2100
Assumptions for fertility rates by age, type of projection and NUTS 3 in Carbonia-Iglesias (NUTS 2016), 2019–2100
Source: Eurostat. Measured in Number.
Analysis
In 2100, assumptions for fertility rates by age, type of projection and nuts 3 in Carbonia-Iglesias (NUTS 2016) stood at 1.43 Number. That is the highest value across all 82 years on record.
The figure is up 0.5% on the previous year and up 5.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, assumptions for fertility rates by age, type of projection and nuts 3 in Carbonia-Iglesias (NUTS 2016) peaked at 1.43 Number in 2100 and was at its lowest, 0.9054 Number, in 2019.
That places Carbonia-Iglesias (NUTS 2016) 1206th out of 1209 regions with data for 2100, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 82 years of available data.
Assumptions for fertility rates by age, type of projection and NUTS 3 in Carbonia-Iglesias (NUTS 2016), year by year
| Year | Number | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 0.9054 Number | — |
| 2020 | 0.9185 Number | +1.4% |
| 2021 | 0.9249 Number | +0.7% |
| 2022 | 0.9312 Number | +0.7% |
| 2023 | 0.9376 Number | +0.7% |
| 2024 | 0.9439 Number | +0.7% |
| 2025 | 0.9502 Number | +0.7% |
| 2026 | 0.9564 Number | +0.7% |
| 2027 | 0.9627 Number | +0.7% |
| 2028 | 0.9689 Number | +0.6% |
| 2029 | 0.9751 Number | +0.6% |
| 2030 | 0.9812 Number | +0.6% |
| 2031 | 0.9874 Number | +0.6% |
| 2032 | 0.9935 Number | +0.6% |
| 2033 | 0.9997 Number | +0.6% |
| 2034 | 1.01 Number | +0.6% |
| 2035 | 1.01 Number | +0.6% |
| 2036 | 1.02 Number | +0.6% |
| 2037 | 1.02 Number | +0.6% |
| 2038 | 1.03 Number | +0.6% |
| 2039 | 1.04 Number | +0.6% |
| 2040 | 1.04 Number | +0.6% |
| 2041 | 1.05 Number | +0.6% |
| 2042 | 1.05 Number | +0.6% |
| 2043 | 1.06 Number | +0.6% |
| 2044 | 1.07 Number | +0.6% |
| 2045 | 1.07 Number | +0.6% |
| 2046 | 1.08 Number | +0.6% |
| 2047 | 1.08 Number | +0.6% |
| 2048 | 1.09 Number | +0.6% |
| 2049 | 1.1 Number | +0.6% |
| 2050 | 1.1 Number | +0.6% |
| 2051 | 1.11 Number | +0.5% |
| 2052 | 1.11 Number | +0.5% |
| 2053 | 1.12 Number | +0.5% |
| 2054 | 1.13 Number | +0.5% |
| 2055 | 1.13 Number | +0.5% |
| 2056 | 1.14 Number | +0.5% |
| 2057 | 1.14 Number | +0.5% |
| 2058 | 1.15 Number | +0.5% |
| 2059 | 1.16 Number | +0.5% |
| 2060 | 1.16 Number | +0.5% |
| 2061 | 1.17 Number | +0.5% |
| 2062 | 1.18 Number | +0.5% |
| 2063 | 1.18 Number | +0.5% |
| 2064 | 1.19 Number | +0.5% |
| 2065 | 1.19 Number | +0.5% |
| 2066 | 1.2 Number | +0.5% |
| 2067 | 1.21 Number | +0.5% |
| 2068 | 1.21 Number | +0.5% |
| 2069 | 1.22 Number | +0.5% |
| 2070 | 1.23 Number | +0.5% |
| 2071 | 1.23 Number | +0.5% |
| 2072 | 1.24 Number | +0.5% |
| 2073 | 1.24 Number | +0.5% |
| 2074 | 1.25 Number | +0.5% |
| 2075 | 1.26 Number | +0.5% |
| 2076 | 1.26 Number | +0.5% |
| 2077 | 1.27 Number | +0.5% |
| 2078 | 1.28 Number | +0.5% |
| 2079 | 1.28 Number | +0.5% |
| 2080 | 1.29 Number | +0.5% |
| 2081 | 1.3 Number | +0.5% |
| 2082 | 1.3 Number | +0.5% |
| 2083 | 1.31 Number | +0.5% |
| 2084 | 1.32 Number | +0.5% |
| 2085 | 1.32 Number | +0.5% |
| 2086 | 1.33 Number | +0.5% |
| 2087 | 1.34 Number | +0.5% |
| 2088 | 1.35 Number | +0.5% |
| 2089 | 1.35 Number | +0.5% |
| 2090 | 1.36 Number | +0.5% |
| 2091 | 1.37 Number | +0.5% |
| 2092 | 1.37 Number | +0.5% |
| 2093 | 1.38 Number | +0.5% |
| 2094 | 1.39 Number | +0.5% |
| 2095 | 1.4 Number | +0.5% |
| 2096 | 1.4 Number | +0.5% |
| 2097 | 1.41 Number | +0.5% |
| 2098 | 1.42 Number | +0.5% |
| 2099 | 1.43 Number | +0.5% |
| 2100 | 1.43 Number | +0.5% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.9054 Number | 0.9054 Number | 0.9054 Number | 1 |
| 2020s | 0.9469 Number | 0.9185 Number | 0.9751 Number | 10 |
| 2030s | 1.01 Number | 0.9812 Number | 1.04 Number | 10 |
| 2040s | 1.07 Number | 1.04 Number | 1.1 Number | 10 |
| 2050s | 1.13 Number | 1.1 Number | 1.16 Number | 10 |
| 2060s | 1.19 Number | 1.16 Number | 1.22 Number | 10 |
| 2070s | 1.25 Number | 1.23 Number | 1.28 Number | 10 |
| 2080s | 1.32 Number | 1.29 Number | 1.35 Number | 10 |
| 2090s | 1.39 Number | 1.36 Number | 1.43 Number | 10 |
| 2100s | 1.43 Number | 1.43 Number | 1.43 Number | 1 |
More population data for Carbonia-Iglesias (NUTS 2016)
- Demographic balances and indicators by type of projection and NUTS 3 -1.06 % change on previous year (2100)
- Demographic balances and indicators by type of projection and NUTS 3 936 (2100)
- Live births (total) by NUTS 3 region 715 Number (2016)
- Population density by NUTS 3 region 82.5 Persons per square kilometre (2020)
- Population on 1 January by broad age group, sex and NUTS 3 region 127,062 Number (2016)
- Population change - Demographic balance and crude rates at regional -631 (2019)
- Population on 1 January by age group, sex and NUTS 3 region 121,097 Number (2020)
- Live births by age group of the mothers and NUTS 3 region 543 Number (2019)
Frequently asked questions
- What is assumptions for fertility rates by age, type of projection and nuts 3 in Carbonia-Iglesias (NUTS 2016)?
- Assumptions for fertility rates by age, type of projection and nuts 3 in Carbonia-Iglesias (NUTS 2016) was 1.43 Number in 2100, according to Eurostat.
- What is the highest assumptions for fertility rates by age, type of projection and nuts 3 recorded in Carbonia-Iglesias (NUTS 2016)?
- The highest recorded value was 1.43 Number in 2100.
- What is the lowest assumptions for fertility rates by age, type of projection and nuts 3 recorded in Carbonia-Iglesias (NUTS 2016)?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.9054 Number in 2019.
- How does Carbonia-Iglesias (NUTS 2016) rank for assumptions for fertility rates by age, type of projection and nuts 3?
- Carbonia-Iglesias (NUTS 2016) ranks 1206th out of 1209 regions with data for 2100.
- Is assumptions for fertility rates by age, type of projection and nuts 3 rising or falling in Carbonia-Iglesias (NUTS 2016)?
- Over the last ten years it is up 5.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Carbonia-Iglesias (NUTS 2016) data come from?
- The figures come from Eurostat, published as part of Assumptions for fertility rates by age, type of projection and NUTS 3 region. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 82 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Eurostat).