Assumptions for fertility rates by age, type of projection and NUTS 3 in Katowicki
Katowicki: Assumptions for fertility rates by age, type of projection and NUTS 3 was 1.65 Number in 2100. ▲ Rising
Latest (2100)
1.65 Number
Change on year
up 0.2%
Rank
903rd
of 1209 regions
All-time high
1.65 Number
in 2100
All-time low
1.36 Number
in 2020
Years of data
82
2019–2100
Assumptions for fertility rates by age, type of projection and NUTS 3 in Katowicki, 2019–2100
Source: Eurostat. Measured in Number.
Analysis
In 2100, assumptions for fertility rates by age, type of projection and nuts 3 in Katowicki stood at 1.65 Number. That is the highest value across all 82 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 0.2% on the previous year and up 1.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, assumptions for fertility rates by age, type of projection and nuts 3 in Katowicki peaked at 1.65 Number in 2100 and was at its lowest, 1.36 Number, in 2020.
That places Katowicki 903rd out of 1209 regions with data for 2100, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 82 years of available data.
Assumptions for fertility rates by age, type of projection and NUTS 3 in Katowicki, year by year
| Year | Number | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 1.38 Number | — |
| 2020 | 1.36 Number | -1.8% |
| 2021 | 1.36 Number | +0.5% |
| 2022 | 1.37 Number | +0.5% |
| 2023 | 1.38 Number | +0.5% |
| 2024 | 1.38 Number | +0.5% |
| 2025 | 1.39 Number | +0.5% |
| 2026 | 1.4 Number | +0.5% |
| 2027 | 1.4 Number | +0.4% |
| 2028 | 1.41 Number | +0.4% |
| 2029 | 1.41 Number | +0.4% |
| 2030 | 1.42 Number | +0.4% |
| 2031 | 1.43 Number | +0.4% |
| 2032 | 1.43 Number | +0.4% |
| 2033 | 1.44 Number | +0.4% |
| 2034 | 1.44 Number | +0.4% |
| 2035 | 1.45 Number | +0.3% |
| 2036 | 1.45 Number | +0.3% |
| 2037 | 1.46 Number | +0.3% |
| 2038 | 1.46 Number | +0.3% |
| 2039 | 1.47 Number | +0.3% |
| 2040 | 1.47 Number | +0.3% |
| 2041 | 1.47 Number | +0.3% |
| 2042 | 1.48 Number | +0.3% |
| 2043 | 1.48 Number | +0.3% |
| 2044 | 1.49 Number | +0.3% |
| 2045 | 1.49 Number | +0.3% |
| 2046 | 1.49 Number | +0.3% |
| 2047 | 1.5 Number | +0.3% |
| 2048 | 1.5 Number | +0.2% |
| 2049 | 1.51 Number | +0.2% |
| 2050 | 1.51 Number | +0.2% |
| 2051 | 1.51 Number | +0.2% |
| 2052 | 1.52 Number | +0.2% |
| 2053 | 1.52 Number | +0.2% |
| 2054 | 1.52 Number | +0.2% |
| 2055 | 1.53 Number | +0.2% |
| 2056 | 1.53 Number | +0.2% |
| 2057 | 1.53 Number | +0.2% |
| 2058 | 1.53 Number | +0.2% |
| 2059 | 1.54 Number | +0.2% |
| 2060 | 1.54 Number | +0.2% |
| 2061 | 1.54 Number | +0.2% |
| 2062 | 1.55 Number | +0.2% |
| 2063 | 1.55 Number | +0.2% |
| 2064 | 1.55 Number | +0.2% |
| 2065 | 1.56 Number | +0.2% |
| 2066 | 1.56 Number | +0.2% |
| 2067 | 1.56 Number | +0.2% |
| 2068 | 1.56 Number | +0.2% |
| 2069 | 1.57 Number | +0.2% |
| 2070 | 1.57 Number | +0.2% |
| 2071 | 1.57 Number | +0.2% |
| 2072 | 1.57 Number | +0.2% |
| 2073 | 1.58 Number | +0.2% |
| 2074 | 1.58 Number | +0.2% |
| 2075 | 1.58 Number | +0.2% |
| 2076 | 1.59 Number | +0.2% |
| 2077 | 1.59 Number | +0.2% |
| 2078 | 1.59 Number | +0.2% |
| 2079 | 1.59 Number | +0.2% |
| 2080 | 1.6 Number | +0.2% |
| 2081 | 1.6 Number | +0.2% |
| 2082 | 1.6 Number | +0.2% |
| 2083 | 1.6 Number | +0.2% |
| 2084 | 1.61 Number | +0.2% |
| 2085 | 1.61 Number | +0.2% |
| 2086 | 1.61 Number | +0.2% |
| 2087 | 1.62 Number | +0.2% |
| 2088 | 1.62 Number | +0.2% |
| 2089 | 1.62 Number | +0.2% |
| 2090 | 1.62 Number | +0.2% |
| 2091 | 1.63 Number | +0.2% |
| 2092 | 1.63 Number | +0.2% |
| 2093 | 1.63 Number | +0.2% |
| 2094 | 1.64 Number | +0.2% |
| 2095 | 1.64 Number | +0.2% |
| 2096 | 1.64 Number | +0.2% |
| 2097 | 1.64 Number | +0.2% |
| 2098 | 1.65 Number | +0.2% |
| 2099 | 1.65 Number | +0.2% |
| 2100 | 1.65 Number | +0.2% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.38 Number | 1.38 Number | 1.38 Number | 1 |
| 2020s | 1.39 Number | 1.36 Number | 1.41 Number | 10 |
| 2030s | 1.44 Number | 1.42 Number | 1.47 Number | 10 |
| 2040s | 1.49 Number | 1.47 Number | 1.51 Number | 10 |
| 2050s | 1.52 Number | 1.51 Number | 1.54 Number | 10 |
| 2060s | 1.55 Number | 1.54 Number | 1.57 Number | 10 |
| 2070s | 1.58 Number | 1.57 Number | 1.59 Number | 10 |
| 2080s | 1.61 Number | 1.6 Number | 1.62 Number | 10 |
| 2090s | 1.64 Number | 1.62 Number | 1.65 Number | 10 |
| 2100s | 1.65 Number | 1.65 Number | 1.65 Number | 1 |
More population data for Katowicki
- Demographic balances and indicators by type of projection and NUTS 3 -0.1561 % change on previous year (2100)
- Demographic balances and indicators by type of projection and NUTS 3 5,756 (2100)
- Live births (total) by NUTS 3 region 4,219 Number (2024)
- Population density by NUTS 3 region 1,785 Persons per square kilometre (2024)
- Population on 1 January by broad age group, sex and NUTS 3 region 672,672 Number (2025)
- Population change - Demographic balance and crude rates at regional 655 (2024)
- Population on 1st January by age group, sex, type of projection and 394,342 Person (2100)
- Population structure indicators by type of projection and NUTS3 region 87.2 (2100)
- Assumptions for total fertility rates, type of projection and NUTS 3 1.42 Number (2095)
- Projected life expectancy at birth, by sex, type of projection and 86.8 Year (2095)
Frequently asked questions
- What is assumptions for fertility rates by age, type of projection and nuts 3 in Katowicki?
- Assumptions for fertility rates by age, type of projection and nuts 3 in Katowicki was 1.65 Number in 2100, according to Eurostat.
- What is the highest assumptions for fertility rates by age, type of projection and nuts 3 recorded in Katowicki?
- The highest recorded value was 1.65 Number in 2100.
- What is the lowest assumptions for fertility rates by age, type of projection and nuts 3 recorded in Katowicki?
- The lowest recorded value was 1.36 Number in 2020.
- How does Katowicki rank for assumptions for fertility rates by age, type of projection and nuts 3?
- Katowicki ranks 903rd out of 1209 regions with data for 2100.
- Is assumptions for fertility rates by age, type of projection and nuts 3 rising or falling in Katowicki?
- Over the last ten years it is up 1.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Katowicki data come from?
- The figures come from Eurostat, published as part of Assumptions for fertility rates by age, type of projection and NUTS 3 region. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 82 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Eurostat).