Assumptions for fertility rates by age, type of projection and NUTS 3 in Kelheim
Kelheim: Assumptions for fertility rates by age, type of projection and NUTS 3 was 1.77 Number in 2100. ▲ Rising
Latest (2100)
1.77 Number
Change on year
up 0.0%
Rank
299th
of 1209 regions
All-time high
1.77 Number
in 2100
All-time low
1.65 Number
in 2020
Years of data
82
2019–2100
Assumptions for fertility rates by age, type of projection and NUTS 3 in Kelheim, 2019–2100
Source: Eurostat. Measured in Number.
Analysis
In 2100, assumptions for fertility rates by age, type of projection and nuts 3 in Kelheim stood at 1.77 Number. That is the highest value across all 82 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 0.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, assumptions for fertility rates by age, type of projection and nuts 3 in Kelheim peaked at 1.77 Number in 2100 and was at its lowest, 1.65 Number, in 2020.
Kelheim ranks 299th of 1209 regions on this measure, in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 82 years of available data.
Assumptions for fertility rates by age, type of projection and NUTS 3 in Kelheim, year by year
| Year | Number | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 1.66 Number | — |
| 2020 | 1.65 Number | -0.9% |
| 2021 | 1.65 Number | +0.3% |
| 2022 | 1.65 Number | +0.3% |
| 2023 | 1.66 Number | +0.3% |
| 2024 | 1.66 Number | +0.2% |
| 2025 | 1.67 Number | +0.2% |
| 2026 | 1.67 Number | +0.2% |
| 2027 | 1.67 Number | +0.2% |
| 2028 | 1.68 Number | +0.2% |
| 2029 | 1.68 Number | +0.2% |
| 2030 | 1.68 Number | +0.2% |
| 2031 | 1.69 Number | +0.2% |
| 2032 | 1.69 Number | +0.2% |
| 2033 | 1.69 Number | +0.2% |
| 2034 | 1.7 Number | +0.2% |
| 2035 | 1.7 Number | +0.2% |
| 2036 | 1.7 Number | +0.2% |
| 2037 | 1.7 Number | +0.1% |
| 2038 | 1.71 Number | +0.1% |
| 2039 | 1.71 Number | +0.1% |
| 2040 | 1.71 Number | +0.1% |
| 2041 | 1.71 Number | +0.1% |
| 2042 | 1.72 Number | +0.1% |
| 2043 | 1.72 Number | +0.1% |
| 2044 | 1.72 Number | +0.1% |
| 2045 | 1.72 Number | +0.1% |
| 2046 | 1.72 Number | +0.1% |
| 2047 | 1.72 Number | +0.1% |
| 2048 | 1.73 Number | +0.1% |
| 2049 | 1.73 Number | +0.1% |
| 2050 | 1.73 Number | +0.1% |
| 2051 | 1.73 Number | +0.1% |
| 2052 | 1.73 Number | +0.1% |
| 2053 | 1.73 Number | +0.1% |
| 2054 | 1.73 Number | +0.1% |
| 2055 | 1.74 Number | +0.1% |
| 2056 | 1.74 Number | +0.1% |
| 2057 | 1.74 Number | +0.1% |
| 2058 | 1.74 Number | +0.1% |
| 2059 | 1.74 Number | +0.1% |
| 2060 | 1.74 Number | +0.1% |
| 2061 | 1.74 Number | +0.1% |
| 2062 | 1.74 Number | +0.1% |
| 2063 | 1.74 Number | +0.1% |
| 2064 | 1.74 Number | +0.0% |
| 2065 | 1.75 Number | +0.0% |
| 2066 | 1.75 Number | +0.0% |
| 2067 | 1.75 Number | +0.0% |
| 2068 | 1.75 Number | +0.0% |
| 2069 | 1.75 Number | +0.0% |
| 2070 | 1.75 Number | +0.0% |
| 2071 | 1.75 Number | +0.0% |
| 2072 | 1.75 Number | +0.0% |
| 2073 | 1.75 Number | +0.0% |
| 2074 | 1.75 Number | +0.0% |
| 2075 | 1.75 Number | +0.0% |
| 2076 | 1.75 Number | +0.0% |
| 2077 | 1.75 Number | +0.0% |
| 2078 | 1.75 Number | +0.0% |
| 2079 | 1.75 Number | +0.0% |
| 2080 | 1.76 Number | +0.0% |
| 2081 | 1.76 Number | +0.0% |
| 2082 | 1.76 Number | +0.0% |
| 2083 | 1.76 Number | +0.0% |
| 2084 | 1.76 Number | +0.0% |
| 2085 | 1.76 Number | +0.0% |
| 2086 | 1.76 Number | +0.0% |
| 2087 | 1.76 Number | +0.0% |
| 2088 | 1.76 Number | +0.0% |
| 2089 | 1.76 Number | +0.0% |
| 2090 | 1.76 Number | +0.0% |
| 2091 | 1.76 Number | +0.0% |
| 2092 | 1.76 Number | +0.0% |
| 2093 | 1.76 Number | +0.0% |
| 2094 | 1.76 Number | +0.0% |
| 2095 | 1.77 Number | +0.0% |
| 2096 | 1.77 Number | +0.0% |
| 2097 | 1.77 Number | +0.0% |
| 2098 | 1.77 Number | +0.0% |
| 2099 | 1.77 Number | +0.0% |
| 2100 | 1.77 Number | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.66 Number | 1.66 Number | 1.66 Number | 1 |
| 2020s | 1.66 Number | 1.65 Number | 1.68 Number | 10 |
| 2030s | 1.7 Number | 1.68 Number | 1.71 Number | 10 |
| 2040s | 1.72 Number | 1.71 Number | 1.73 Number | 10 |
| 2050s | 1.73 Number | 1.73 Number | 1.74 Number | 10 |
| 2060s | 1.74 Number | 1.74 Number | 1.75 Number | 10 |
| 2070s | 1.75 Number | 1.75 Number | 1.75 Number | 10 |
| 2080s | 1.76 Number | 1.76 Number | 1.76 Number | 10 |
| 2090s | 1.77 Number | 1.76 Number | 1.77 Number | 10 |
| 2100s | 1.77 Number | 1.77 Number | 1.77 Number | 1 |
More population data for Kelheim
- Demographic balances and indicators by type of projection and NUTS 3 -0.3467 % change on previous year (2100)
- Demographic balances and indicators by type of projection and NUTS 3 1,437 (2100)
- Live births (total) by NUTS 3 region 1,107 Number (2024)
- Population density by NUTS 3 region 118.8 Persons per square kilometre (2024)
- Population on 1 January by broad age group, sex and NUTS 3 region 126,037 Number (2025)
- Population change - Demographic balance and crude rates at regional 646 (2024)
- Population on 1st January by age group, sex, type of projection and 118,802 Person (2100)
- Population structure indicators by type of projection and NUTS3 region 82.8 (2100)
- Assumptions for total fertility rates, type of projection and NUTS 3 1.61 Number (2095)
- Projected life expectancy at birth, by sex, type of projection and 88.3 Year (2095)
Frequently asked questions
- What is assumptions for fertility rates by age, type of projection and nuts 3 in Kelheim?
- Assumptions for fertility rates by age, type of projection and nuts 3 in Kelheim was 1.77 Number in 2100, according to Eurostat.
- What is the highest assumptions for fertility rates by age, type of projection and nuts 3 recorded in Kelheim?
- The highest recorded value was 1.77 Number in 2100.
- What is the lowest assumptions for fertility rates by age, type of projection and nuts 3 recorded in Kelheim?
- The lowest recorded value was 1.65 Number in 2020.
- How does Kelheim rank for assumptions for fertility rates by age, type of projection and nuts 3?
- Kelheim ranks 299th out of 1209 regions with data for 2100.
- Is assumptions for fertility rates by age, type of projection and nuts 3 rising or falling in Kelheim?
- Over the last ten years it is up 0.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Kelheim data come from?
- The figures come from Eurostat, published as part of Assumptions for fertility rates by age, type of projection and NUTS 3 region. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 82 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Eurostat).