Assumptions for fertility rates by age, type of projection and NUTS 3 in La Réunion
La Réunion: Assumptions for fertility rates by age, type of projection and NUTS 3 was 2.02 Number in 2100. ▼ Falling
Assumptions for fertility rates by age, type of projection and NUTS 3 in La Réunion, 2019–2100
Source: Eurostat. Measured in Number.
Analysis
In 2100, assumptions for fertility rates by age, type of projection and nuts 3 in La Réunion stood at 2.02 Number. That is the lowest value across all 82 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 0.2% on the previous year and down 1.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, assumptions for fertility rates by age, type of projection and nuts 3 in La Réunion peaked at 2.35 Number in 2019 and was at its lowest, 2.02 Number, in 2100.
La Réunion ranks 5th of 1209 regions on this measure, in the top 10%.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 82 years of available data.
Assumptions for fertility rates by age, type of projection and NUTS 3 in La Réunion, year by year
| Year | Number | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 2.35 Number | — |
| 2020 | 2.33 Number | -0.6% |
| 2021 | 2.33 Number | -0.2% |
| 2022 | 2.33 Number | -0.2% |
| 2023 | 2.32 Number | -0.2% |
| 2024 | 2.32 Number | -0.2% |
| 2025 | 2.31 Number | -0.2% |
| 2026 | 2.31 Number | -0.2% |
| 2027 | 2.3 Number | -0.2% |
| 2028 | 2.3 Number | -0.2% |
| 2029 | 2.3 Number | -0.2% |
| 2030 | 2.29 Number | -0.2% |
| 2031 | 2.29 Number | -0.2% |
| 2032 | 2.28 Number | -0.2% |
| 2033 | 2.28 Number | -0.2% |
| 2034 | 2.28 Number | -0.2% |
| 2035 | 2.27 Number | -0.2% |
| 2036 | 2.27 Number | -0.2% |
| 2037 | 2.26 Number | -0.2% |
| 2038 | 2.26 Number | -0.2% |
| 2039 | 2.26 Number | -0.2% |
| 2040 | 2.25 Number | -0.2% |
| 2041 | 2.25 Number | -0.2% |
| 2042 | 2.24 Number | -0.2% |
| 2043 | 2.24 Number | -0.2% |
| 2044 | 2.24 Number | -0.2% |
| 2045 | 2.23 Number | -0.2% |
| 2046 | 2.23 Number | -0.2% |
| 2047 | 2.23 Number | -0.2% |
| 2048 | 2.22 Number | -0.2% |
| 2049 | 2.22 Number | -0.2% |
| 2050 | 2.21 Number | -0.2% |
| 2051 | 2.21 Number | -0.2% |
| 2052 | 2.21 Number | -0.2% |
| 2053 | 2.2 Number | -0.2% |
| 2054 | 2.2 Number | -0.2% |
| 2055 | 2.19 Number | -0.2% |
| 2056 | 2.19 Number | -0.2% |
| 2057 | 2.19 Number | -0.2% |
| 2058 | 2.18 Number | -0.2% |
| 2059 | 2.18 Number | -0.2% |
| 2060 | 2.17 Number | -0.2% |
| 2061 | 2.17 Number | -0.2% |
| 2062 | 2.17 Number | -0.2% |
| 2063 | 2.16 Number | -0.2% |
| 2064 | 2.16 Number | -0.2% |
| 2065 | 2.15 Number | -0.2% |
| 2066 | 2.15 Number | -0.2% |
| 2067 | 2.15 Number | -0.2% |
| 2068 | 2.14 Number | -0.2% |
| 2069 | 2.14 Number | -0.2% |
| 2070 | 2.13 Number | -0.2% |
| 2071 | 2.13 Number | -0.2% |
| 2072 | 2.13 Number | -0.2% |
| 2073 | 2.12 Number | -0.2% |
| 2074 | 2.12 Number | -0.2% |
| 2075 | 2.12 Number | -0.2% |
| 2076 | 2.11 Number | -0.2% |
| 2077 | 2.11 Number | -0.2% |
| 2078 | 2.1 Number | -0.2% |
| 2079 | 2.1 Number | -0.2% |
| 2080 | 2.1 Number | -0.2% |
| 2081 | 2.09 Number | -0.2% |
| 2082 | 2.09 Number | -0.2% |
| 2083 | 2.08 Number | -0.2% |
| 2084 | 2.08 Number | -0.2% |
| 2085 | 2.08 Number | -0.2% |
| 2086 | 2.07 Number | -0.2% |
| 2087 | 2.07 Number | -0.2% |
| 2088 | 2.06 Number | -0.2% |
| 2089 | 2.06 Number | -0.2% |
| 2090 | 2.06 Number | -0.2% |
| 2091 | 2.05 Number | -0.2% |
| 2092 | 2.05 Number | -0.2% |
| 2093 | 2.05 Number | -0.2% |
| 2094 | 2.04 Number | -0.2% |
| 2095 | 2.04 Number | -0.2% |
| 2096 | 2.03 Number | -0.2% |
| 2097 | 2.03 Number | -0.2% |
| 2098 | 2.03 Number | -0.2% |
| 2099 | 2.02 Number | -0.2% |
| 2100 | 2.02 Number | -0.2% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2.35 Number | 2.35 Number | 2.35 Number | 1 |
| 2020s | 2.32 Number | 2.3 Number | 2.33 Number | 10 |
| 2030s | 2.27 Number | 2.26 Number | 2.29 Number | 10 |
| 2040s | 2.24 Number | 2.22 Number | 2.25 Number | 10 |
| 2050s | 2.2 Number | 2.18 Number | 2.21 Number | 10 |
| 2060s | 2.16 Number | 2.14 Number | 2.17 Number | 10 |
| 2070s | 2.12 Number | 2.1 Number | 2.13 Number | 10 |
| 2080s | 2.08 Number | 2.06 Number | 2.1 Number | 10 |
| 2090s | 2.04 Number | 2.02 Number | 2.06 Number | 10 |
| 2100s | 2.02 Number | 2.02 Number | 2.02 Number | 1 |
Countries ranked near La Réunion
- 2 Guadeloupe 1.91 Number compare
- 3 Martinique 1.85 Number compare
- 4 Liechtenstein 1.66 Number compare
- 5 Luxembourg 1.64 Number compare
- 6 Malta 1.53 Number compare
More population data for La Réunion
- Demographic balances and indicators by type of projection and NUTS 3 0.3295 % change on previous year (2100)
- Demographic balances and indicators by type of projection and NUTS 3 8,221 (2100)
- Population on 1 January by age group, sex and NUTS 2 region 904,180 Number (2025)
- Population on 1 January by age, sex and NUTS 2 region 904,180 Number (2025)
- Animal populations by NUTS 2 region 21.48 Thousand heads (animals) (2025)
- Live births (total) by NUTS 3 region 11,818 Number (2024)
- Population density by NUTS 3 region 363.6 Persons per square kilometre (2024)
- Population on 1 January by broad age group, sex and NUTS 3 region 904,180 Number (2025)
- Live births by mother's age and NUTS 2 region 11,818 Number (2024)
- Fertility rates by age and NUTS 2 region 2.12 Number (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is assumptions for fertility rates by age, type of projection and nuts 3 in La Réunion?
- Assumptions for fertility rates by age, type of projection and nuts 3 in La Réunion was 2.02 Number in 2100, according to Eurostat.
- What is the highest assumptions for fertility rates by age, type of projection and nuts 3 recorded in La Réunion?
- The highest recorded value was 2.35 Number in 2019.
- What is the lowest assumptions for fertility rates by age, type of projection and nuts 3 recorded in La Réunion?
- The lowest recorded value was 2.02 Number in 2100.
- How does La Réunion rank for assumptions for fertility rates by age, type of projection and nuts 3?
- La Réunion ranks 5th out of 1209 regions with data for 2100.
- Is assumptions for fertility rates by age, type of projection and nuts 3 rising or falling in La Réunion?
- Over the last ten years it is down 1.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this La Réunion data come from?
- The figures come from Eurostat, published as part of Assumptions for fertility rates by age, type of projection and NUTS 3 region. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 82 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Eurostat).