Assumptions for fertility rates by age, type of projection and NUTS 3 in Mid-West
Mid-West: Assumptions for fertility rates by age, type of projection and NUTS 3 was 1.89 Number in 2100. ▼ Falling
Latest (2100)
1.89 Number
Change on year
down 0.1%
Rank
20th
of 1209 regions
All-time high
1.99 Number
in 2020
All-time low
1.89 Number
in 2100
Years of data
82
2019–2100
Assumptions for fertility rates by age, type of projection and NUTS 3 in Mid-West, 2019–2100
Source: Eurostat. Measured in Number.
Analysis
In 2100, assumptions for fertility rates by age, type of projection and nuts 3 in Mid-West stood at 1.89 Number. That is the lowest value across all 82 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 0.1% on the previous year and down 0.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, assumptions for fertility rates by age, type of projection and nuts 3 in Mid-West peaked at 1.99 Number in 2020 and was at its lowest, 1.89 Number, in 2100.
That places Mid-West 20th out of 1209 regions with data for 2100, putting it in the top 10%.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 82 years of available data.
Assumptions for fertility rates by age, type of projection and NUTS 3 in Mid-West, year by year
| Year | Number | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 1.97 Number | — |
| 2020 | 1.99 Number | +1.1% |
| 2021 | 1.99 Number | -0.1% |
| 2022 | 1.99 Number | -0.1% |
| 2023 | 1.99 Number | -0.1% |
| 2024 | 1.99 Number | -0.1% |
| 2025 | 1.98 Number | -0.1% |
| 2026 | 1.98 Number | -0.1% |
| 2027 | 1.98 Number | -0.1% |
| 2028 | 1.98 Number | -0.1% |
| 2029 | 1.98 Number | -0.1% |
| 2030 | 1.98 Number | -0.1% |
| 2031 | 1.98 Number | -0.1% |
| 2032 | 1.98 Number | -0.1% |
| 2033 | 1.97 Number | -0.1% |
| 2034 | 1.97 Number | -0.1% |
| 2035 | 1.97 Number | -0.1% |
| 2036 | 1.97 Number | -0.1% |
| 2037 | 1.97 Number | -0.1% |
| 2038 | 1.97 Number | -0.1% |
| 2039 | 1.97 Number | -0.1% |
| 2040 | 1.97 Number | -0.1% |
| 2041 | 1.96 Number | -0.1% |
| 2042 | 1.96 Number | -0.1% |
| 2043 | 1.96 Number | -0.1% |
| 2044 | 1.96 Number | -0.1% |
| 2045 | 1.96 Number | -0.1% |
| 2046 | 1.96 Number | -0.1% |
| 2047 | 1.96 Number | -0.1% |
| 2048 | 1.96 Number | -0.1% |
| 2049 | 1.95 Number | -0.1% |
| 2050 | 1.95 Number | -0.1% |
| 2051 | 1.95 Number | -0.1% |
| 2052 | 1.95 Number | -0.1% |
| 2053 | 1.95 Number | -0.1% |
| 2054 | 1.95 Number | -0.1% |
| 2055 | 1.95 Number | -0.1% |
| 2056 | 1.95 Number | -0.1% |
| 2057 | 1.94 Number | -0.1% |
| 2058 | 1.94 Number | -0.1% |
| 2059 | 1.94 Number | -0.1% |
| 2060 | 1.94 Number | -0.1% |
| 2061 | 1.94 Number | -0.1% |
| 2062 | 1.94 Number | -0.1% |
| 2063 | 1.94 Number | -0.1% |
| 2064 | 1.94 Number | -0.1% |
| 2065 | 1.93 Number | -0.1% |
| 2066 | 1.93 Number | -0.1% |
| 2067 | 1.93 Number | -0.1% |
| 2068 | 1.93 Number | -0.1% |
| 2069 | 1.93 Number | -0.1% |
| 2070 | 1.93 Number | -0.1% |
| 2071 | 1.93 Number | -0.1% |
| 2072 | 1.93 Number | -0.1% |
| 2073 | 1.92 Number | -0.1% |
| 2074 | 1.92 Number | -0.1% |
| 2075 | 1.92 Number | -0.1% |
| 2076 | 1.92 Number | -0.1% |
| 2077 | 1.92 Number | -0.1% |
| 2078 | 1.92 Number | -0.1% |
| 2079 | 1.92 Number | -0.1% |
| 2080 | 1.92 Number | -0.1% |
| 2081 | 1.91 Number | -0.1% |
| 2082 | 1.91 Number | -0.1% |
| 2083 | 1.91 Number | -0.1% |
| 2084 | 1.91 Number | -0.1% |
| 2085 | 1.91 Number | -0.1% |
| 2086 | 1.91 Number | -0.1% |
| 2087 | 1.91 Number | -0.1% |
| 2088 | 1.91 Number | -0.1% |
| 2089 | 1.9 Number | -0.1% |
| 2090 | 1.9 Number | -0.1% |
| 2091 | 1.9 Number | -0.1% |
| 2092 | 1.9 Number | -0.1% |
| 2093 | 1.9 Number | -0.1% |
| 2094 | 1.9 Number | -0.1% |
| 2095 | 1.9 Number | -0.1% |
| 2096 | 1.9 Number | -0.1% |
| 2097 | 1.89 Number | -0.1% |
| 2098 | 1.89 Number | -0.1% |
| 2099 | 1.89 Number | -0.1% |
| 2100 | 1.89 Number | -0.1% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.97 Number | 1.97 Number | 1.97 Number | 1 |
| 2020s | 1.99 Number | 1.98 Number | 1.99 Number | 10 |
| 2030s | 1.97 Number | 1.97 Number | 1.98 Number | 10 |
| 2040s | 1.96 Number | 1.95 Number | 1.97 Number | 10 |
| 2050s | 1.95 Number | 1.94 Number | 1.95 Number | 10 |
| 2060s | 1.93 Number | 1.93 Number | 1.94 Number | 10 |
| 2070s | 1.92 Number | 1.92 Number | 1.93 Number | 10 |
| 2080s | 1.91 Number | 1.9 Number | 1.92 Number | 10 |
| 2090s | 1.9 Number | 1.89 Number | 1.9 Number | 10 |
| 2100s | 1.89 Number | 1.89 Number | 1.89 Number | 1 |
More population data for Mid-West
- Demographic balances and indicators by type of projection and NUTS 3 0.133 % change on previous year (2100)
- Demographic balances and indicators by type of projection and NUTS 3 6,778 (2100)
- Live births (total) by NUTS 3 region 5,097 Number (2024)
- Population density by NUTS 3 region 52.9 Persons per square kilometre (2024)
- Population on 1 January by broad age group, sex and NUTS 3 region 540,371 Number (2025)
- Population change - Demographic balance and crude rates at regional 9,591 (2024)
- Population on 1st January by age group, sex, type of projection and 558,944 Person (2100)
- Population structure indicators by type of projection and NUTS3 region 92 (2100)
- Assumptions for total fertility rates, type of projection and NUTS 3 1.64 Number (2095)
- Projected life expectancy at birth, by sex, type of projection and 89.2 Year (2095)
Frequently asked questions
- What is assumptions for fertility rates by age, type of projection and nuts 3 in Mid-West?
- Assumptions for fertility rates by age, type of projection and nuts 3 in Mid-West was 1.89 Number in 2100, according to Eurostat.
- What is the highest assumptions for fertility rates by age, type of projection and nuts 3 recorded in Mid-West?
- The highest recorded value was 1.99 Number in 2020.
- What is the lowest assumptions for fertility rates by age, type of projection and nuts 3 recorded in Mid-West?
- The lowest recorded value was 1.89 Number in 2100.
- How does Mid-West rank for assumptions for fertility rates by age, type of projection and nuts 3?
- Mid-West ranks 20th out of 1209 regions with data for 2100.
- Is assumptions for fertility rates by age, type of projection and nuts 3 rising or falling in Mid-West?
- Over the last ten years it is down 0.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Mid-West data come from?
- The figures come from Eurostat, published as part of Assumptions for fertility rates by age, type of projection and NUTS 3 region. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 82 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Eurostat).