General government total expenditure (current LCU), annual growth rate in Belarus
Belarus: General government total expenditure (current LCU), annual growth rate was 10.3 % change on previous year in 2025. ◆ Volatile
General government total expenditure (current LCU), annual growth rate in Belarus, 2002–2025
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
Belarus recorded 10.3 % change on previous year for general government total expenditure (current lcu), annual growth rate in 2025.
That represents a change of down 34.3% on the previous year and down 48.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, general government total expenditure (current lcu), annual growth rate in Belarus peaked at 72.04 % change on previous year in 2012 and was at its lowest, -8.76 % change on previous year, in 2009.
That places Belarus 65th out of 196 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
General government total expenditure (current LCU), annual growth rate in Belarus, year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2002 | 57.1 % change on previous year | — |
| 2003 | 39.14 % change on previous year | -31.5% |
| 2004 | 38.21 % change on previous year | -2.4% |
| 2005 | 33.05 % change on previous year | -13.5% |
| 2006 | 27.82 % change on previous year | -15.8% |
| 2007 | 27.68 % change on previous year | -0.5% |
| 2008 | 63 % change on previous year | +127.6% |
| 2009 | -8.76 % change on previous year | -113.9% |
| 2010 | 2.83 % change on previous year | -132.3% |
| 2011 | 63.87 % change on previous year | +2155.8% |
| 2012 | 72.04 % change on previous year | +12.8% |
| 2013 | 28.52 % change on previous year | -60.4% |
| 2014 | 14.32 % change on previous year | -49.8% |
| 2015 | 20.01 % change on previous year | +39.7% |
| 2016 | 2.86 % change on previous year | -85.7% |
| 2017 | 6.88 % change on previous year | +140.8% |
| 2018 | 12.12 % change on previous year | +76.2% |
| 2019 | 8.72 % change on previous year | -28.1% |
| 2020 | 13.18 % change on previous year | +51.2% |
| 2021 | 11.61 % change on previous year | -11.9% |
| 2022 | 15.82 % change on previous year | +36.3% |
| 2023 | 18.36 % change on previous year | +16.0% |
| 2024 | 15.67 % change on previous year | -14.6% |
| 2025 | 10.3 % change on previous year | -34.3% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 34.66 % change on previous year | -8.76 % change on previous year | 63 % change on previous year | 8 |
| 2010s | 23.22 % change on previous year | 2.83 % change on previous year | 72.04 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2020s | 14.16 % change on previous year | 10.3 % change on previous year | 18.36 % change on previous year | 6 |
Countries ranked near Belarus
- 62 Albania 10.74 % change on previous year compare
- 63 Bosnia and Herzegovina 10.6 % change on previous year compare
- 64 Fiji 10.31 % change on previous year compare
- 66 Timor-Leste 10.22 % change on previous year compare
- 67 Trinidad and Tobago 9.81 % change on previous year compare
- 68 Mali 9.77 % change on previous year compare
More population data for Belarus
- Population regions with projections, annual growth rate -1.15 % change on previous year (2100)
- Urban and rural population 2050, annual growth rate -3.09 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population long run with projections, annual growth rate -1.15 % change on previous year (2100)
- Un population 2024 vs 2022, annual growth rate -0.4414 % change on previous year (2100)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 05 - Demographic estimates 8,410 Persons (2050)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 03 - Annual population -0.4518 Percent per annum (2030)
- Projected population under age 5, annual growth rate -0.1945 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population growth rate -1.16 (2100)
- Population density 21.44 (2100)
- Projected population under age 5 144,679 (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is general government total expenditure (current lcu), annual growth rate in Belarus?
- General government total expenditure (current lcu), annual growth rate in Belarus was 10.3 % change on previous year in 2025, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest general government total expenditure (current lcu), annual growth rate recorded in Belarus?
- The highest recorded value was 72.04 % change on previous year in 2012.
- What is the lowest general government total expenditure (current lcu), annual growth rate recorded in Belarus?
- The lowest recorded value was -8.76 % change on previous year in 2009.
- How does Belarus rank for general government total expenditure (current lcu), annual growth rate?
- Belarus ranks 65th out of 196 countries with data for 2025.
- Is general government total expenditure (current lcu), annual growth rate rising or falling in Belarus?
- Over the last ten years it is down 48.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Belarus data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of General government total expenditure (current LCU), annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 24 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in General government total expenditure (current LCU). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- General government total expenditure UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in General government total expenditure (current LCU). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.