Australia vs Switzerland: Demographic indicators by urban-rural typology — Deaths

Australia
7.85 Per 1 000 inhabitants
in 2024
Switzerland
8.02 Per 1 000 inhabitants
in 2025
Australia rank
30th
Switzerland rank
28th

Demographic indicators by urban-rural typology — Deaths over time

  • Australia
  • Switzerland
0246810199020072025

How they compare

Switzerland currently reports 8.02 Per 1 000 inhabitants against 7.85 Per 1 000 inhabitants in Australia, a difference of 0.17 Per 1 000 inhabitants.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Switzerland has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 30th and Switzerland ranks 28th of 38 countries.

Switzerland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Switzerland Difference Ahead
2000s 7.14 Per 1 000 inhabitants 8.41 Per 1 000 inhabitants 1.27 Per 1 000 inhabitants Switzerland
2010s 7.35 Per 1 000 inhabitants 8.07 Per 1 000 inhabitants 0.7215 Per 1 000 inhabitants Switzerland
2020s 7.75 Per 1 000 inhabitants 8.47 Per 1 000 inhabitants 0.7152 Per 1 000 inhabitants Switzerland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher demographic indicators by urban-rural typology — deaths, Australia or Switzerland?
Switzerland, at 8.02 Per 1 000 inhabitants against 7.85 Per 1 000 inhabitants in Australia as of 2025.
What is the difference in demographic indicators by urban-rural typology — deaths between Australia and Switzerland?
0.17 Per 1 000 inhabitants, with Switzerland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Switzerland?
24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
How do Australia and Switzerland rank globally for demographic indicators by urban-rural typology — deaths?
Australia ranks 30th and Switzerland ranks 28th of 38 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Demographic indicators by urban-rural typology — Deaths. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Switzerland: Demographic indicators by urban-rural typology — Deaths. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://population.statizoid.com/compare/demographic-indicators-by-urban-rural-typology-deaths/australia/switzerland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://population.statizoid.com/compare/demographic-indicators-by-urban-rural-typology-deaths/australia/switzerland/">Australia vs Switzerland: Demographic indicators by urban-rural typology — Deaths</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Demographic indicators by urban-rural typology — Deaths
Unit
Per 1 000 inhabitants
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
41 places, 991 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

This dataset provides indicators on demogrpahy by regional urban-rural typology. Data source and definition The data by typology includes share of population, dependency rates, fertility and mortality rates, population mobility within and outside countries. Data is collected from Eurostat (reg_dem) for EU countries and via delegates of the OECD Working Party on Territorial Indicators (WPTI), as well as from national statistical offices' websites. The indicators are aggregated data within a country based on the typology of small (TL3) regions to calculate a total or average for all predominantly rural regions, intermediate regions or predominantly urban regions. Territorial typology based on urban-rural population Territorial typologies helps to assess differences in socio-economic trends in regions, both within and across countries and to highlight the specific issues faced by each type of region. Traditionally the OECD has classified small (TL3) regions as predominantly urban, intermediate, or predominantly rural regions. Predominantly rural regions can be further broken down as 'Close to city' and 'Remote', see the methodology (pdf). This typology remains of interest for users, although the Access to City typology is now the one used by OECD analysts. List of OECD regions and typologies are presented in the OECD Territorial correspondence table (xlsx). Maps of For more information, see the OECD Territorial grid (pdf). Cite this dataset OECD Regions, Cities and Local Areas database http://oe.cd/geostats Further information OECD Regions and Cities Statistical Atlas OECD Regions and Cities at a Glance For questions and/or comments, please email RegionStat@oecd.org.