Iceland vs Mexico: Demographic indicators by urban-rural typology — Deaths
Demographic indicators by urban-rural typology — Deaths over time
- Iceland
- Mexico
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 6.33 Per 1 000 inhabitants against 6.29 Per 1 000 inhabitants in Mexico, a difference of 0.04 Per 1 000 inhabitants.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Iceland ahead.
Iceland ranks 34th and Mexico ranks 35th of 38 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 1 and Mexico in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Mexico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 6.41 Per 1 000 inhabitants | 5.64 Per 1 000 inhabitants | 0.7696 Per 1 000 inhabitants | Iceland |
| 2020s | 6.26 Per 1 000 inhabitants | 8.53 Per 1 000 inhabitants | 2.27 Per 1 000 inhabitants | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher demographic indicators by urban-rural typology — deaths, Iceland or Mexico?
- Iceland, at 6.33 Per 1 000 inhabitants against 6.29 Per 1 000 inhabitants in Mexico as of 2021.
- What is the difference in demographic indicators by urban-rural typology — deaths between Iceland and Mexico?
- 0.04 Per 1 000 inhabitants, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Mexico?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2021.
- How do Iceland and Mexico rank globally for demographic indicators by urban-rural typology — deaths?
- Iceland ranks 34th and Mexico ranks 35th of 38 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Demographic indicators by urban-rural typology — Deaths. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset provides indicators on demogrpahy by regional urban-rural typology. Data source and definition The data by typology includes share of population, dependency rates, fertility and mortality rates, population mobility within and outside countries. Data is collected from Eurostat (reg_dem) for EU countries and via delegates of the OECD Working Party on Territorial Indicators (WPTI), as well as from national statistical offices' websites. The indicators are aggregated data within a country based on the typology of small (TL3) regions to calculate a total or average for all predominantly rural regions, intermediate regions or predominantly urban regions. Territorial typology based on urban-rural population Territorial typologies helps to assess differences in socio-economic trends in regions, both within and across countries and to highlight the specific issues faced by each type of region. Traditionally the OECD has classified small (TL3) regions as predominantly urban, intermediate, or predominantly rural regions. Predominantly rural regions can be further broken down as 'Close to city' and 'Remote', see the methodology (pdf). This typology remains of interest for users, although the Access to City typology is now the one used by OECD analysts. List of OECD regions and typologies are presented in the OECD Territorial correspondence table (xlsx). Maps of For more information, see the OECD Territorial grid (pdf). Cite this dataset OECD Regions, Cities and Local Areas database http://oe.cd/geostats Further information OECD Regions and Cities Statistical Atlas OECD Regions and Cities at a Glance For questions and/or comments, please email RegionStat@oecd.org.