Lithuania vs Romania: Demographic indicators by urban-rural typology — Deaths

Lithuania
13.79 Per 1 000 inhabitants
in 2024
Romania
12.81 Per 1 000 inhabitants
in 2024
Lithuania rank
4th
Romania rank
7th

Demographic indicators by urban-rural typology — Deaths over time

  • Lithuania
  • Romania
05101520199020072024

How they compare

Lithuania currently reports 13.79 Per 1 000 inhabitants against 12.81 Per 1 000 inhabitants in Romania, a difference of 0.98 Per 1 000 inhabitants.

That makes Lithuania's figure about 1.1 times Romania's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Lithuania ahead.

Lithuania ranks 4th and Romania ranks 7th of 38 countries.

Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lithuania Romania Difference Ahead
1990s 11.87 Per 1 000 inhabitants 11.57 Per 1 000 inhabitants 0.2954 Per 1 000 inhabitants Lithuania
2000s 12.7 Per 1 000 inhabitants 11.47 Per 1 000 inhabitants 1.22 Per 1 000 inhabitants Lithuania
2010s 14.47 Per 1 000 inhabitants 12.78 Per 1 000 inhabitants 1.69 Per 1 000 inhabitants Lithuania
2020s 15.57 Per 1 000 inhabitants 14.49 Per 1 000 inhabitants 1.08 Per 1 000 inhabitants Lithuania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher demographic indicators by urban-rural typology — deaths, Lithuania or Romania?
Lithuania, at 13.79 Per 1 000 inhabitants against 12.81 Per 1 000 inhabitants in Romania as of 2024.
What is the difference in demographic indicators by urban-rural typology — deaths between Lithuania and Romania?
0.98 Per 1 000 inhabitants, with Lithuania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Romania?
27 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2024.
How do Lithuania and Romania rank globally for demographic indicators by urban-rural typology — deaths?
Lithuania ranks 4th and Romania ranks 7th of 38 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Demographic indicators by urban-rural typology — Deaths. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lithuania vs Romania: Demographic indicators by urban-rural typology — Deaths. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://population.statizoid.com/compare/demographic-indicators-by-urban-rural-typology-deaths/lithuania/romania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://population.statizoid.com/compare/demographic-indicators-by-urban-rural-typology-deaths/lithuania/romania/">Lithuania vs Romania: Demographic indicators by urban-rural typology — Deaths</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Demographic indicators by urban-rural typology — Deaths
Unit
Per 1 000 inhabitants
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
41 places, 991 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

This dataset provides indicators on demogrpahy by regional urban-rural typology. Data source and definition The data by typology includes share of population, dependency rates, fertility and mortality rates, population mobility within and outside countries. Data is collected from Eurostat (reg_dem) for EU countries and via delegates of the OECD Working Party on Territorial Indicators (WPTI), as well as from national statistical offices' websites. The indicators are aggregated data within a country based on the typology of small (TL3) regions to calculate a total or average for all predominantly rural regions, intermediate regions or predominantly urban regions. Territorial typology based on urban-rural population Territorial typologies helps to assess differences in socio-economic trends in regions, both within and across countries and to highlight the specific issues faced by each type of region. Traditionally the OECD has classified small (TL3) regions as predominantly urban, intermediate, or predominantly rural regions. Predominantly rural regions can be further broken down as 'Close to city' and 'Remote', see the methodology (pdf). This typology remains of interest for users, although the Access to City typology is now the one used by OECD analysts. List of OECD regions and typologies are presented in the OECD Territorial correspondence table (xlsx). Maps of For more information, see the OECD Territorial grid (pdf). Cite this dataset OECD Regions, Cities and Local Areas database http://oe.cd/geostats Further information OECD Regions and Cities Statistical Atlas OECD Regions and Cities at a Glance For questions and/or comments, please email RegionStat@oecd.org.