Cote d'Ivoire vs Equatorial Guinea: GDP (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Cote d'Ivoire
133.97 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea
170.63 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Cote d'Ivoire rank
33rd
Equatorial Guinea rank
30th

GDP (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Cote d'Ivoire
  • Equatorial Guinea
0100.0M200.0M300.0M197019962023

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 170.63 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 133.97 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Cote d'Ivoire, a difference of 36.66 million constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.3 times Cote d'Ivoire's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 44 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Cote d'Ivoire ahead.

Cote d'Ivoire ranks 33rd and Equatorial Guinea ranks 30th of 211 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Cote d'Ivoire averaged higher in 2 and Equatorial Guinea in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cote d'Ivoire Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
1980s 40.49 million constant LCU per square kilometre 2.86 million constant LCU per square kilometre 37.63 million constant LCU per square kilometre Cote d'Ivoire
1990s 47.23 million constant LCU per square kilometre 13.79 million constant LCU per square kilometre 33.44 million constant LCU per square kilometre Cote d'Ivoire
2000s 55.21 million constant LCU per square kilometre 157.48 million constant LCU per square kilometre 102.26 million constant LCU per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2010s 83.01 million constant LCU per square kilometre 231.39 million constant LCU per square kilometre 148.38 million constant LCU per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2020s 122.14 million constant LCU per square kilometre 174.31 million constant LCU per square kilometre 52.17 million constant LCU per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gdp (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Cote d'Ivoire or Equatorial Guinea?
Equatorial Guinea, at 170.63 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 133.97 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Cote d'Ivoire as of 2023.
What is the difference in gdp (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Cote d'Ivoire and Equatorial Guinea?
36.66 million constant LCU per square kilometre, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cote d'Ivoire and Equatorial Guinea?
44 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2023.
How do Cote d'Ivoire and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for gdp (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Cote d'Ivoire ranks 33rd and Equatorial Guinea ranks 30th of 211 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GDP (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cote d'Ivoire vs Equatorial Guinea: GDP (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://population.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre-2/cote-d-ivoire/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://population.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre-2/cote-d-ivoire/equatorial-guinea/">Cote d'Ivoire vs Equatorial Guinea: GDP (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GDP (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
211 places, 9,737 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

GDP (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.