Cote d'Ivoire vs Tanzania: GDP (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Cote d'Ivoire
133.97 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Tanzania
158.52 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Cote d'Ivoire rank
33rd
Tanzania rank
32nd

GDP (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Cote d'Ivoire
  • Tanzania
050.0M100.0M150.0M197019962023

How they compare

Tanzania currently reports 158.52 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 133.97 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Cote d'Ivoire, a difference of 24.55 million constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Tanzania's figure about 1.2 times Cote d'Ivoire's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Cote d'Ivoire ahead.

Cote d'Ivoire ranks 33rd and Tanzania ranks 32nd of 211 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Cote d'Ivoire averaged higher in 3 and Tanzania in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cote d'Ivoire Tanzania Difference Ahead
1970s 32.91 million constant LCU per square kilometre 19.49 million constant LCU per square kilometre 13.42 million constant LCU per square kilometre Cote d'Ivoire
1980s 40.49 million constant LCU per square kilometre 24.31 million constant LCU per square kilometre 16.18 million constant LCU per square kilometre Cote d'Ivoire
1990s 47.23 million constant LCU per square kilometre 34.20 million constant LCU per square kilometre 13.03 million constant LCU per square kilometre Cote d'Ivoire
2000s 55.21 million constant LCU per square kilometre 56.69 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.47 million constant LCU per square kilometre Tanzania
2010s 83.01 million constant LCU per square kilometre 105.05 million constant LCU per square kilometre 22.04 million constant LCU per square kilometre Tanzania
2020s 122.14 million constant LCU per square kilometre 147.99 million constant LCU per square kilometre 25.85 million constant LCU per square kilometre Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gdp (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Cote d'Ivoire or Tanzania?
Tanzania, at 158.52 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 133.97 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Cote d'Ivoire as of 2023.
What is the difference in gdp (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Cote d'Ivoire and Tanzania?
24.55 million constant LCU per square kilometre, with Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cote d'Ivoire and Tanzania?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Cote d'Ivoire and Tanzania rank globally for gdp (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Cote d'Ivoire ranks 33rd and Tanzania ranks 32nd of 211 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GDP (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cote d'Ivoire vs Tanzania: GDP (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://population.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre-2/cote-d-ivoire/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://population.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre-2/cote-d-ivoire/tanzania/">Cote d'Ivoire vs Tanzania: GDP (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GDP (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
211 places, 9,737 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

GDP (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.