Aruba vs Grenada: Replacement fertility rate
Aruba
2.1
in 2010
Grenada
2.1
in 2010
Aruba rank
115th
Grenada rank
115th
Replacement fertility rate over time
- Aruba
- Grenada
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 2.1 against 2.1 in Grenada, a difference of 0.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Grenada has been ahead every year.
Aruba ranks 115th and Grenada ranks 115th of 199 countries.
Grenada has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Grenada | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 2.38 | 2.54 | 0.16 | Grenada |
| 1960s | 2.22 | 2.36 | 0.14 | Grenada |
| 1970s | 2.14 | 2.25 | 0.11 | Grenada |
| 1980s | 2.11 | 2.18 | 0.07 | Grenada |
| 1990s | 2.11 | 2.14 | 0.03 | Grenada |
| 2000s | 2.11 | 2.11 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 2.1 | 2.1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher replacement fertility rate, Aruba or Grenada?
- Aruba, at 2.1 against 2.1 in Grenada as of 2010.
- What is the difference in replacement fertility rate between Aruba and Grenada?
- 0, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Grenada?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2010.
- How do Aruba and Grenada rank globally for replacement fertility rate?
- Aruba ranks 115th and Grenada ranks 115th of 199 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Replacement fertility rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.