Aruba vs Grenada: Replacement-level fertility rate
Aruba
2.1
in 2010
Grenada
2.1
in 2010
Aruba rank
115th
Grenada rank
115th
Replacement-level fertility rate over time
- Aruba
- Grenada
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 2.1 against 2.1 in Grenada, a difference of 0.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Grenada has been ahead every year.
Aruba ranks 115th and Grenada ranks 115th of 199 countries.
Grenada has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Grenada | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 2.38 | 2.54 | 0.16 | Grenada |
| 1960s | 2.22 | 2.36 | 0.14 | Grenada |
| 1970s | 2.14 | 2.25 | 0.11 | Grenada |
| 1980s | 2.11 | 2.18 | 0.07 | Grenada |
| 1990s | 2.11 | 2.14 | 0.03 | Grenada |
| 2000s | 2.11 | 2.11 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 2.1 | 2.1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher replacement-level fertility rate, Aruba or Grenada?
- Aruba, at 2.1 against 2.1 in Grenada as of 2010.
- What is the difference in replacement-level fertility rate between Aruba and Grenada?
- 0, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Grenada?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2010.
- How do Aruba and Grenada rank globally for replacement-level fertility rate?
- Aruba ranks 115th and Grenada ranks 115th of 199 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Gietel-Basten and Scherbov (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Replacement-level fertility rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The replacement-level fertility rate (the total fertility rate needed to keep the population size stable over time, without migration) is commonly stated to be 2.1. But the level can vary based on the sex ratio, child mortality rates, and other factors.