Australia vs New Zealand: Replacement fertility rate
Australia
2.08
in 2010
New Zealand
2.08
in 2010
Australia rank
148th
New Zealand rank
148th
Replacement fertility rate over time
- Australia
- New Zealand
How they compare
Australia currently reports 2.08 against 2.08 in New Zealand, a difference of 0.
Across all 7 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 148th and New Zealand ranks 148th of 198 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 2.14 | 2.16 | 0.02 | New Zealand |
| 1960s | 2.13 | 2.13 | 0 | β |
| 1970s | 2.11 | 2.11 | 0 | β |
| 1980s | 2.09 | 2.1 | 0.01 | New Zealand |
| 1990s | 2.09 | 2.1 | 0.01 | New Zealand |
| 2000s | 2.08 | 2.08 | 0 | β |
| 2010s | 2.08 | 2.08 | 0 | β |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher replacement fertility rate, Australia or New Zealand?
- Australia, at 2.08 against 2.08 in New Zealand as of 2010.
- What is the difference in replacement fertility rate between Australia and New Zealand?
- 0, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2010.
- How do Australia and New Zealand rank globally for replacement fertility rate?
- Australia ranks 148th and New Zealand ranks 148th of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Replacement fertility rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.