Bhutan vs Solomon Islands: Replacement-level fertility rate

Bhutan
2.21
in 2010
Solomon Islands
2.19
in 2010
Bhutan rank
59th
Solomon Islands rank
62nd

Replacement-level fertility rate over time

  • Bhutan
  • Solomon Islands
01234195019802010

How they compare

Bhutan currently reports 2.21 against 2.19 in Solomon Islands, a difference of 0.02.

Across all 7 years both countries report, Bhutan has been ahead every year.

Bhutan ranks 59th and Solomon Islands ranks 62nd of 199 countries.

Bhutan has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan Solomon Islands Difference Ahead
1950s 3.98 3.1 0.88 Bhutan
1960s 3.64 2.84 0.8 Bhutan
1970s 3.21 2.6 0.61 Bhutan
1980s 2.85 2.49 0.36 Bhutan
1990s 2.55 2.51 0.04 Bhutan
2000s 2.31 2.3 0.01 Bhutan
2010s 2.21 2.19 0.02 Bhutan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher replacement-level fertility rate, Bhutan or Solomon Islands?
Bhutan, at 2.21 against 2.19 in Solomon Islands as of 2010.
What is the difference in replacement-level fertility rate between Bhutan and Solomon Islands?
0.02, with Bhutan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Solomon Islands?
7 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2010.
How do Bhutan and Solomon Islands rank globally for replacement-level fertility rate?
Bhutan ranks 59th and Solomon Islands ranks 62nd of 199 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Gietel-Basten and Scherbov (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Replacement-level fertility rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Replacement-level fertility rate
Source
Gietel-Basten and Scherbov (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
199 places, 1,393 data points, 1950–2010
Last refreshed

The replacement-level fertility rate (the total fertility rate needed to keep the population size stable over time, without migration) is commonly stated to be 2.1. But the level can vary based on the sex ratio, child mortality rates, and other factors.