Bosnia and Herzegovina vs New Caledonia: Replacement fertility rate
Bosnia and Herzegovina
2.09
in 2010
New Caledonia
2.09
in 2010
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
125th
New Caledonia rank
125th
Replacement fertility rate over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- New Caledonia
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 2.09 against 2.09 in New Caledonia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 1950 it was New Caledonia ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 125th and New Caledonia ranks 125th of 199 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 1 and New Caledonia in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | New Caledonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 2.66 | 2.76 | 0.1 | New Caledonia |
| 1960s | 2.35 | 2.46 | 0.11 | New Caledonia |
| 1970s | 2.21 | 2.27 | 0.06 | New Caledonia |
| 1980s | 2.14 | 2.16 | 0.02 | New Caledonia |
| 1990s | 2.13 | 2.12 | 0.01 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2000s | 2.1 | 2.1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 2.09 | 2.09 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher replacement fertility rate, Bosnia and Herzegovina or New Caledonia?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 2.09 against 2.09 in New Caledonia as of 2010.
- What is the difference in replacement fertility rate between Bosnia and Herzegovina and New Caledonia?
- 0, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and New Caledonia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2010.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and New Caledonia rank globally for replacement fertility rate?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 125th and New Caledonia ranks 125th of 199 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Replacement fertility rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.