Canada vs French Guiana: Replacement-level fertility rate

Canada
2.08
in 2010
French Guiana
2.08
in 2010
Canada rank
148th
French Guiana rank
148th

Replacement-level fertility rate over time

  • Canada
  • French Guiana
0123195019802010

How they compare

Canada currently reports 2.08 against 2.08 in French Guiana, a difference of 0.

Across all 7 years both countries report, French Guiana has been ahead every year.

Canada ranks 148th and French Guiana ranks 148th of 199 countries.

French Guiana has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Canada French Guiana Difference Ahead
1950s 2.18 2.54 0.36 French Guiana
1960s 2.14 2.35 0.21 French Guiana
1970s 2.12 2.19 0.07 French Guiana
1980s 2.09 2.14 0.05 French Guiana
1990s 2.08 2.11 0.03 French Guiana
2000s 2.08 2.09 0.01 French Guiana
2010s 2.08 2.08 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher replacement-level fertility rate, Canada or French Guiana?
Canada, at 2.08 against 2.08 in French Guiana as of 2010.
What is the difference in replacement-level fertility rate between Canada and French Guiana?
0, with Canada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and French Guiana?
7 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2010.
How do Canada and French Guiana rank globally for replacement-level fertility rate?
Canada ranks 148th and French Guiana ranks 148th of 199 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Gietel-Basten and Scherbov (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Replacement-level fertility rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Replacement-level fertility rate
Source
Gietel-Basten and Scherbov (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
199 places, 1,393 data points, 1950–2010
Last refreshed

The replacement-level fertility rate (the total fertility rate needed to keep the population size stable over time, without migration) is commonly stated to be 2.1. But the level can vary based on the sex ratio, child mortality rates, and other factors.