Curacao vs Latvia: Replacement fertility rate
Curacao
2.09
in 2010
Latvia
2.09
in 2010
Curacao rank
125th
Latvia rank
125th
Replacement fertility rate over time
- Curacao
- Latvia
How they compare
Curacao currently reports 2.09 against 2.09 in Latvia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 1950 it was Latvia ahead.
Curacao ranks 125th and Latvia ranks 125th of 199 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Curacao averaged higher in 2 and Latvia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Curacao | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 2.34 | 2.36 | 0.02 | Latvia |
| 1960s | 2.22 | 2.17 | 0.05 | Curacao |
| 1970s | 2.15 | 2.13 | 0.02 | Curacao |
| 1980s | 2.11 | 2.12 | 0.01 | Latvia |
| 1990s | 2.1 | 2.11 | 0.01 | Latvia |
| 2000s | 2.1 | 2.1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 2.09 | 2.09 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher replacement fertility rate, Curacao or Latvia?
- Curacao, at 2.09 against 2.09 in Latvia as of 2010.
- What is the difference in replacement fertility rate between Curacao and Latvia?
- 0, with Curacao ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Curacao and Latvia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2010.
- How do Curacao and Latvia rank globally for replacement fertility rate?
- Curacao ranks 125th and Latvia ranks 125th of 199 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Replacement fertility rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.