Curacao vs New Caledonia: Replacement fertility rate
Curacao
2.09
in 2010
New Caledonia
2.09
in 2010
Curacao rank
125th
New Caledonia rank
125th
Replacement fertility rate over time
- Curacao
- New Caledonia
How they compare
Curacao currently reports 2.09 against 2.09 in New Caledonia, a difference of 0.
Across all 7 years both countries report, New Caledonia has been ahead every year.
Curacao ranks 125th and New Caledonia ranks 125th of 199 countries.
New Caledonia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Curacao | New Caledonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 2.34 | 2.76 | 0.42 | New Caledonia |
| 1960s | 2.22 | 2.46 | 0.24 | New Caledonia |
| 1970s | 2.15 | 2.27 | 0.12 | New Caledonia |
| 1980s | 2.11 | 2.16 | 0.05 | New Caledonia |
| 1990s | 2.1 | 2.12 | 0.02 | New Caledonia |
| 2000s | 2.1 | 2.1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 2.09 | 2.09 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher replacement fertility rate, Curacao or New Caledonia?
- Curacao, at 2.09 against 2.09 in New Caledonia as of 2010.
- What is the difference in replacement fertility rate between Curacao and New Caledonia?
- 0, with Curacao ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Curacao and New Caledonia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2010.
- How do Curacao and New Caledonia rank globally for replacement fertility rate?
- Curacao ranks 125th and New Caledonia ranks 125th of 199 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Replacement fertility rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.