Curacao vs Romania: Replacement fertility rate
Curacao
2.09
in 2010
Romania
2.09
in 2010
Curacao rank
125th
Romania rank
125th
Replacement fertility rate over time
- Curacao
- Romania
How they compare
Curacao currently reports 2.09 against 2.09 in Romania, a difference of 0.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Romania has been ahead every year.
Curacao ranks 125th and Romania ranks 125th of 199 countries.
Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Curacao | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 2.34 | 2.38 | 0.04 | Romania |
| 1960s | 2.22 | 2.22 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 2.15 | 2.18 | 0.03 | Romania |
| 1980s | 2.11 | 2.14 | 0.03 | Romania |
| 1990s | 2.1 | 2.13 | 0.03 | Romania |
| 2000s | 2.1 | 2.11 | 0.01 | Romania |
| 2010s | 2.09 | 2.09 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher replacement fertility rate, Curacao or Romania?
- Curacao, at 2.09 against 2.09 in Romania as of 2010.
- What is the difference in replacement fertility rate between Curacao and Romania?
- 0, with Curacao ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Curacao and Romania?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2010.
- How do Curacao and Romania rank globally for replacement fertility rate?
- Curacao ranks 125th and Romania ranks 125th of 199 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Replacement fertility rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.