Curacao vs Singapore: Replacement-level fertility rate
Curacao
2.09
in 2010
Singapore
2.09
in 2010
Curacao rank
125th
Singapore rank
125th
Replacement-level fertility rate over time
- Curacao
- Singapore
How they compare
Curacao currently reports 2.09 against 2.09 in Singapore, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 7 shared years of data; in 1950 it was Singapore ahead.
Curacao ranks 125th and Singapore ranks 125th of 199 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Curacao averaged higher in 2 and Singapore in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Curacao | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 2.34 | 2.34 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 2.22 | 2.18 | 0.04 | Curacao |
| 1970s | 2.15 | 2.15 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 2.11 | 2.12 | 0.01 | Singapore |
| 1990s | 2.1 | 2.1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 2.1 | 2.09 | 0.01 | Curacao |
| 2010s | 2.09 | 2.09 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher replacement-level fertility rate, Curacao or Singapore?
- Curacao, at 2.09 against 2.09 in Singapore as of 2010.
- What is the difference in replacement-level fertility rate between Curacao and Singapore?
- 0, with Curacao ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Curacao and Singapore?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2010.
- How do Curacao and Singapore rank globally for replacement-level fertility rate?
- Curacao ranks 125th and Singapore ranks 125th of 199 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Gietel-Basten and Scherbov (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Replacement-level fertility rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The replacement-level fertility rate (the total fertility rate needed to keep the population size stable over time, without migration) is commonly stated to be 2.1. But the level can vary based on the sex ratio, child mortality rates, and other factors.