Cyprus vs Saudi Arabia: Replacement-level fertility rate

Cyprus
2.09
in 2010
Saudi Arabia
2.09
in 2010
Cyprus rank
125th
Saudi Arabia rank
125th

Replacement-level fertility rate over time

  • Cyprus
  • Saudi Arabia
0123195019802010

How they compare

Cyprus currently reports 2.09 against 2.09 in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 0.

Across all 7 years both countries report, Saudi Arabia has been ahead every year.

Cyprus ranks 125th and Saudi Arabia ranks 125th of 199 countries.

Saudi Arabia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cyprus Saudi Arabia Difference Ahead
1950s 2.29 3.23 0.94 Saudi Arabia
1960s 2.2 2.93 0.73 Saudi Arabia
1970s 2.15 2.55 0.4 Saudi Arabia
1980s 2.12 2.27 0.15 Saudi Arabia
1990s 2.1 2.16 0.06 Saudi Arabia
2000s 2.09 2.11 0.02 Saudi Arabia
2010s 2.09 2.09 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher replacement-level fertility rate, Cyprus or Saudi Arabia?
Cyprus, at 2.09 against 2.09 in Saudi Arabia as of 2010.
What is the difference in replacement-level fertility rate between Cyprus and Saudi Arabia?
0, with Cyprus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Saudi Arabia?
7 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2010.
How do Cyprus and Saudi Arabia rank globally for replacement-level fertility rate?
Cyprus ranks 125th and Saudi Arabia ranks 125th of 199 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Gietel-Basten and Scherbov (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Replacement-level fertility rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Replacement-level fertility rate
Source
Gietel-Basten and Scherbov (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
199 places, 1,393 data points, 1950–2010
Last refreshed

The replacement-level fertility rate (the total fertility rate needed to keep the population size stable over time, without migration) is commonly stated to be 2.1. But the level can vary based on the sex ratio, child mortality rates, and other factors.