El Salvador vs Trinidad and Tobago: Replacement-level fertility rate
El Salvador
2.12
in 2010
Trinidad and Tobago
2.12
in 2010
El Salvador rank
93rd
Trinidad and Tobago rank
93rd
Replacement-level fertility rate over time
- El Salvador
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 2.12 against 2.12 in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 1950 it was El Salvador ahead.
El Salvador ranks 93rd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 93rd of 199 countries.
El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 2.98 | 2.39 | 0.59 | El Salvador |
| 1960s | 2.71 | 2.23 | 0.48 | El Salvador |
| 1970s | 2.53 | 2.19 | 0.34 | El Salvador |
| 1980s | 2.41 | 2.15 | 0.26 | El Salvador |
| 1990s | 2.2 | 2.13 | 0.07 | El Salvador |
| 2000s | 2.14 | 2.14 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 2.12 | 2.12 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher replacement-level fertility rate, El Salvador or Trinidad and Tobago?
- El Salvador, at 2.12 against 2.12 in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2010.
- What is the difference in replacement-level fertility rate between El Salvador and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 0, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2010.
- How do El Salvador and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for replacement-level fertility rate?
- El Salvador ranks 93rd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 93rd of 199 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Gietel-Basten and Scherbov (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Replacement-level fertility rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The replacement-level fertility rate (the total fertility rate needed to keep the population size stable over time, without migration) is commonly stated to be 2.1. But the level can vary based on the sex ratio, child mortality rates, and other factors.