Eswatini vs Gambia: Replacement-level fertility rate

Eswatini
2.38
in 2010
Gambia
2.37
in 2010
Eswatini rank
24th
Gambia rank
25th

Replacement-level fertility rate over time

  • Eswatini
  • Gambia
01234195019802010

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 2.38 against 2.37 in Gambia, a difference of 0.01.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 1950 it was Gambia ahead.

Eswatini ranks 24th and Gambia ranks 25th of 199 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 2 and Gambia in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Gambia Difference Ahead
1950s 3.19 4.18 0.99 Gambia
1960s 2.97 3.88 0.91 Gambia
1970s 2.75 3.28 0.53 Gambia
1980s 2.49 2.84 0.35 Gambia
1990s 2.37 2.64 0.27 Gambia
2000s 2.7 2.49 0.21 Eswatini
2010s 2.38 2.37 0.01 Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher replacement-level fertility rate, Eswatini or Gambia?
Eswatini, at 2.38 against 2.37 in Gambia as of 2010.
What is the difference in replacement-level fertility rate between Eswatini and Gambia?
0.01, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Gambia?
7 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2010.
How do Eswatini and Gambia rank globally for replacement-level fertility rate?
Eswatini ranks 24th and Gambia ranks 25th of 199 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Gietel-Basten and Scherbov (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Replacement-level fertility rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Replacement-level fertility rate
Source
Gietel-Basten and Scherbov (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
199 places, 1,393 data points, 1950–2010
Last refreshed

The replacement-level fertility rate (the total fertility rate needed to keep the population size stable over time, without migration) is commonly stated to be 2.1. But the level can vary based on the sex ratio, child mortality rates, and other factors.