Guyana vs Western Sahara: Replacement-level fertility rate

Guyana
2.17
in 2010
Western Sahara
2.17
in 2010
Guyana rank
71st
Western Sahara rank
71st

Replacement-level fertility rate over time

  • Guyana
  • Western Sahara
01234195019802010

How they compare

Guyana currently reports 2.17 against 2.17 in Western Sahara, a difference of 0.

Across all 7 years both countries report, Western Sahara has been ahead every year.

Guyana ranks 71st and Western Sahara ranks 71st of 199 countries.

Western Sahara has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guyana Western Sahara Difference Ahead
1950s 2.39 3.61 1.22 Western Sahara
1960s 2.33 3.31 0.98 Western Sahara
1970s 2.28 3.07 0.79 Western Sahara
1980s 2.24 2.66 0.42 Western Sahara
1990s 2.22 2.41 0.19 Western Sahara
2000s 2.19 2.27 0.08 Western Sahara
2010s 2.17 2.17 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher replacement-level fertility rate, Guyana or Western Sahara?
Guyana, at 2.17 against 2.17 in Western Sahara as of 2010.
What is the difference in replacement-level fertility rate between Guyana and Western Sahara?
0, with Guyana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and Western Sahara?
7 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2010.
How do Guyana and Western Sahara rank globally for replacement-level fertility rate?
Guyana ranks 71st and Western Sahara ranks 71st of 199 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Gietel-Basten and Scherbov (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Replacement-level fertility rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Replacement-level fertility rate
Source
Gietel-Basten and Scherbov (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
199 places, 1,393 data points, 1950–2010
Last refreshed

The replacement-level fertility rate (the total fertility rate needed to keep the population size stable over time, without migration) is commonly stated to be 2.1. But the level can vary based on the sex ratio, child mortality rates, and other factors.