Iraq vs Solomon Islands: Replacement-level fertility rate

Iraq
2.19
in 2010
Solomon Islands
2.19
in 2010
Iraq rank
62nd
Solomon Islands rank
62nd

Replacement-level fertility rate over time

  • Iraq
  • Solomon Islands
01234195019802010

How they compare

Iraq currently reports 2.19 against 2.19 in Solomon Islands, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 1950 it was Iraq ahead.

Iraq ranks 62nd and Solomon Islands ranks 62nd of 199 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Iraq averaged higher in 1 and Solomon Islands in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iraq Solomon Islands Difference Ahead
1950s 3.55 3.1 0.45 Iraq
1960s 2.83 2.84 0.01 Solomon Islands
1970s 2.48 2.6 0.12 Solomon Islands
1980s 2.29 2.49 0.2 Solomon Islands
1990s 2.22 2.51 0.29 Solomon Islands
2000s 2.2 2.3 0.1 Solomon Islands
2010s 2.19 2.19 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher replacement-level fertility rate, Iraq or Solomon Islands?
Iraq, at 2.19 against 2.19 in Solomon Islands as of 2010.
What is the difference in replacement-level fertility rate between Iraq and Solomon Islands?
0, with Iraq ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iraq and Solomon Islands?
7 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2010.
How do Iraq and Solomon Islands rank globally for replacement-level fertility rate?
Iraq ranks 62nd and Solomon Islands ranks 62nd of 199 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Gietel-Basten and Scherbov (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Replacement-level fertility rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Replacement-level fertility rate
Source
Gietel-Basten and Scherbov (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
199 places, 1,393 data points, 1950–2010
Last refreshed

The replacement-level fertility rate (the total fertility rate needed to keep the population size stable over time, without migration) is commonly stated to be 2.1. But the level can vary based on the sex ratio, child mortality rates, and other factors.