Latvia vs Singapore: Replacement-level fertility rate

Latvia
2.09
in 2010
Singapore
2.09
in 2010
Latvia rank
125th
Singapore rank
125th

Replacement-level fertility rate over time

  • Latvia
  • Singapore
00.511.522.5195019802010

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 2.09 against 2.09 in Singapore, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 7 shared years of data; in 1950 it was Latvia ahead.

Latvia ranks 125th and Singapore ranks 125th of 199 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 3 and Singapore in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia Singapore Difference Ahead
1950s 2.36 2.34 0.02 Latvia
1960s 2.17 2.18 0.01 Singapore
1970s 2.13 2.15 0.02 Singapore
1980s 2.12 2.12 0
1990s 2.11 2.1 0.01 Latvia
2000s 2.1 2.09 0.01 Latvia
2010s 2.09 2.09 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher replacement-level fertility rate, Latvia or Singapore?
Latvia, at 2.09 against 2.09 in Singapore as of 2010.
What is the difference in replacement-level fertility rate between Latvia and Singapore?
0, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Singapore?
7 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2010.
How do Latvia and Singapore rank globally for replacement-level fertility rate?
Latvia ranks 125th and Singapore ranks 125th of 199 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Gietel-Basten and Scherbov (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Replacement-level fertility rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Replacement-level fertility rate
Source
Gietel-Basten and Scherbov (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
199 places, 1,393 data points, 1950–2010
Last refreshed

The replacement-level fertility rate (the total fertility rate needed to keep the population size stable over time, without migration) is commonly stated to be 2.1. But the level can vary based on the sex ratio, child mortality rates, and other factors.