Maldives vs Thailand: Replacement-level fertility rate

Maldives
2.11
in 2010
Thailand
2.11
in 2010
Maldives rank
106th
Thailand rank
106th

Replacement-level fertility rate over time

  • Maldives
  • Thailand
01234195019802010

How they compare

Maldives currently reports 2.11 against 2.11 in Thailand, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 1950 it was Maldives ahead.

Maldives ranks 106th and Thailand ranks 106th of 199 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Maldives averaged higher in 5 and Thailand in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Maldives Thailand Difference Ahead
1950s 3.81 2.81 1 Maldives
1960s 3.44 2.57 0.87 Maldives
1970s 2.96 2.39 0.57 Maldives
1980s 2.55 2.24 0.31 Maldives
1990s 2.32 2.15 0.17 Maldives
2000s 2.14 2.15 0.01 Thailand
2010s 2.11 2.11 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher replacement-level fertility rate, Maldives or Thailand?
Maldives, at 2.11 against 2.11 in Thailand as of 2010.
What is the difference in replacement-level fertility rate between Maldives and Thailand?
0, with Maldives ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Maldives and Thailand?
7 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2010.
How do Maldives and Thailand rank globally for replacement-level fertility rate?
Maldives ranks 106th and Thailand ranks 106th of 199 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Gietel-Basten and Scherbov (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Replacement-level fertility rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Replacement-level fertility rate
Source
Gietel-Basten and Scherbov (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
199 places, 1,393 data points, 1950–2010
Last refreshed

The replacement-level fertility rate (the total fertility rate needed to keep the population size stable over time, without migration) is commonly stated to be 2.1. But the level can vary based on the sex ratio, child mortality rates, and other factors.