Malta vs Puerto Rico: Replacement-level fertility rate

Malta
2.08
in 2010
Puerto Rico
2.08
in 2010
Malta rank
148th
Puerto Rico rank
148th

Replacement-level fertility rate over time

  • Malta
  • Puerto Rico
00.511.522.5195019802010

How they compare

Malta currently reports 2.08 against 2.08 in Puerto Rico, a difference of 0.

Across all 7 years both countries report, Puerto Rico has been ahead every year.

Malta ranks 148th and Puerto Rico ranks 148th of 199 countries.

Puerto Rico has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malta Puerto Rico Difference Ahead
1950s 2.21 2.29 0.08 Puerto Rico
1960s 2.14 2.19 0.05 Puerto Rico
1970s 2.12 2.13 0.01 Puerto Rico
1980s 2.1 2.11 0.01 Puerto Rico
1990s 2.09 2.09 0
2000s 2.08 2.08 0
2010s 2.08 2.08 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher replacement-level fertility rate, Malta or Puerto Rico?
Malta, at 2.08 against 2.08 in Puerto Rico as of 2010.
What is the difference in replacement-level fertility rate between Malta and Puerto Rico?
0, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Puerto Rico?
7 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2010.
How do Malta and Puerto Rico rank globally for replacement-level fertility rate?
Malta ranks 148th and Puerto Rico ranks 148th of 199 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Gietel-Basten and Scherbov (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Replacement-level fertility rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Replacement-level fertility rate
Source
Gietel-Basten and Scherbov (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
199 places, 1,393 data points, 1950–2010
Last refreshed

The replacement-level fertility rate (the total fertility rate needed to keep the population size stable over time, without migration) is commonly stated to be 2.1. But the level can vary based on the sex ratio, child mortality rates, and other factors.