Mauritius vs New Caledonia: Replacement fertility rate
Mauritius
2.09
in 2010
New Caledonia
2.09
in 2010
Mauritius rank
125th
New Caledonia rank
125th
Replacement fertility rate over time
- Mauritius
- New Caledonia
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 2.09 against 2.09 in New Caledonia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 1950 it was New Caledonia ahead.
Mauritius ranks 125th and New Caledonia ranks 125th of 199 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 1 and New Caledonia in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | New Caledonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 2.7 | 2.76 | 0.06 | New Caledonia |
| 1960s | 2.34 | 2.46 | 0.12 | New Caledonia |
| 1970s | 2.29 | 2.27 | 0.02 | Mauritius |
| 1980s | 2.14 | 2.16 | 0.02 | New Caledonia |
| 1990s | 2.11 | 2.12 | 0.01 | New Caledonia |
| 2000s | 2.09 | 2.1 | 0.01 | New Caledonia |
| 2010s | 2.09 | 2.09 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher replacement fertility rate, Mauritius or New Caledonia?
- Mauritius, at 2.09 against 2.09 in New Caledonia as of 2010.
- What is the difference in replacement fertility rate between Mauritius and New Caledonia?
- 0, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and New Caledonia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2010.
- How do Mauritius and New Caledonia rank globally for replacement fertility rate?
- Mauritius ranks 125th and New Caledonia ranks 125th of 199 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Replacement fertility rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.