Moldova vs Montenegro: Replacement-level fertility rate

Moldova
2.1
in 2010
Montenegro
2.1
in 2010
Moldova rank
115th
Montenegro rank
115th

Replacement-level fertility rate over time

  • Moldova
  • Montenegro
00.511.522.5195019802010

How they compare

Moldova currently reports 2.1 against 2.1 in Montenegro, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 1950 it was Montenegro ahead.

Moldova ranks 115th and Montenegro ranks 115th of 199 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Moldova averaged higher in 2 and Montenegro in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Moldova Montenegro Difference Ahead
1950s 2.32 2.45 0.13 Montenegro
1960s 2.23 2.31 0.08 Montenegro
1970s 2.19 2.18 0.01 Moldova
1980s 2.17 2.16 0.01 Moldova
1990s 2.14 2.14 0
2000s 2.12 2.12 0
2010s 2.1 2.1 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher replacement-level fertility rate, Moldova or Montenegro?
Moldova, at 2.1 against 2.1 in Montenegro as of 2010.
What is the difference in replacement-level fertility rate between Moldova and Montenegro?
0, with Moldova ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Moldova and Montenegro?
7 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2010.
How do Moldova and Montenegro rank globally for replacement-level fertility rate?
Moldova ranks 115th and Montenegro ranks 115th of 199 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Gietel-Basten and Scherbov (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Replacement-level fertility rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Replacement-level fertility rate
Source
Gietel-Basten and Scherbov (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
199 places, 1,393 data points, 1950–2010
Last refreshed

The replacement-level fertility rate (the total fertility rate needed to keep the population size stable over time, without migration) is commonly stated to be 2.1. But the level can vary based on the sex ratio, child mortality rates, and other factors.