New Caledonia vs Saudi Arabia: Replacement fertility rate

New Caledonia
2.09
in 2010
Saudi Arabia
2.09
in 2010
New Caledonia rank
125th
Saudi Arabia rank
125th

Replacement fertility rate over time

  • New Caledonia
  • Saudi Arabia
0123195019802010

How they compare

New Caledonia currently reports 2.09 against 2.09 in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 0.

Across all 7 years both countries report, Saudi Arabia has been ahead every year.

New Caledonia ranks 125th and Saudi Arabia ranks 125th of 199 countries.

Saudi Arabia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Caledonia Saudi Arabia Difference Ahead
1950s 2.76 3.23 0.47 Saudi Arabia
1960s 2.46 2.93 0.47 Saudi Arabia
1970s 2.27 2.55 0.28 Saudi Arabia
1980s 2.16 2.27 0.11 Saudi Arabia
1990s 2.12 2.16 0.04 Saudi Arabia
2000s 2.1 2.11 0.01 Saudi Arabia
2010s 2.09 2.09 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher replacement fertility rate, New Caledonia or Saudi Arabia?
New Caledonia, at 2.09 against 2.09 in Saudi Arabia as of 2010.
What is the difference in replacement fertility rate between New Caledonia and Saudi Arabia?
0, with New Caledonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Saudi Arabia?
7 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2010.
How do New Caledonia and Saudi Arabia rank globally for replacement fertility rate?
New Caledonia ranks 125th and Saudi Arabia ranks 125th of 199 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Our World in Data, published as Replacement fertility rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Replacement fertility rate
Source
Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
199 places, 1,393 data points, 1950–2010
Last refreshed