New Caledonia vs Sri Lanka: Replacement fertility rate
New Caledonia
2.09
in 2010
Sri Lanka
2.09
in 2010
New Caledonia rank
125th
Sri Lanka rank
125th
Replacement fertility rate over time
- New Caledonia
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
New Caledonia currently reports 2.09 against 2.09 in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 1950 it was New Caledonia ahead.
New Caledonia ranks 125th and Sri Lanka ranks 125th of 199 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, New Caledonia averaged higher in 2 and Sri Lanka in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Caledonia | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 2.76 | 2.59 | 0.17 | New Caledonia |
| 1960s | 2.46 | 2.36 | 0.1 | New Caledonia |
| 1970s | 2.27 | 2.27 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 2.16 | 2.19 | 0.03 | Sri Lanka |
| 1990s | 2.12 | 2.13 | 0.01 | Sri Lanka |
| 2000s | 2.1 | 2.11 | 0.01 | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 2.09 | 2.09 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher replacement fertility rate, New Caledonia or Sri Lanka?
- New Caledonia, at 2.09 against 2.09 in Sri Lanka as of 2010.
- What is the difference in replacement fertility rate between New Caledonia and Sri Lanka?
- 0, with New Caledonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Sri Lanka?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2010.
- How do New Caledonia and Sri Lanka rank globally for replacement fertility rate?
- New Caledonia ranks 125th and Sri Lanka ranks 125th of 199 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Replacement fertility rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.