Singapore vs Uruguay: Replacement-level fertility rate

Singapore
2.09
in 2010
Uruguay
2.09
in 2010
Singapore rank
125th
Uruguay rank
125th

Replacement-level fertility rate over time

  • Singapore
  • Uruguay
00.511.522.5195019802010

How they compare

Singapore currently reports 2.09 against 2.09 in Uruguay, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 1950 it was Singapore ahead.

Singapore ranks 125th and Uruguay ranks 125th of 199 regions.

Across the 7 decades both report, Singapore averaged higher in 1 and Uruguay in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Singapore Uruguay Difference Ahead
1950s 2.34 2.22 0.12 Singapore
1960s 2.18 2.19 0.01 Uruguay
1970s 2.15 2.18 0.03 Uruguay
1980s 2.12 2.15 0.03 Uruguay
1990s 2.1 2.11 0.01 Uruguay
2000s 2.09 2.1 0.01 Uruguay
2010s 2.09 2.09 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher replacement-level fertility rate, Singapore or Uruguay?
Singapore, at 2.09 against 2.09 in Uruguay as of 2010.
What is the difference in replacement-level fertility rate between Singapore and Uruguay?
0, with Singapore ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Singapore and Uruguay?
7 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2010.
How do Singapore and Uruguay rank globally for replacement-level fertility rate?
Singapore ranks 125th and Uruguay ranks 125th of 199 regions.
Where does this data come from?
Gietel-Basten and Scherbov (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Replacement-level fertility rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Replacement-level fertility rate
Source
Gietel-Basten and Scherbov (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
199 places, 1,393 data points, 1950–2010
Last refreshed

The replacement-level fertility rate (the total fertility rate needed to keep the population size stable over time, without migration) is commonly stated to be 2.1. But the level can vary based on the sex ratio, child mortality rates, and other factors.