Sudan vs Zimbabwe: Replacement fertility rate
Sudan
2.33
in 2010
Zimbabwe
2.32
in 2010
Sudan rank
33rd
Zimbabwe rank
34th
Replacement fertility rate over time
- Sudan
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 2.33 against 2.32 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.01.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 1950 it was Sudan ahead.
Sudan ranks 33rd and Zimbabwe ranks 34th of 199 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Sudan averaged higher in 6 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sudan | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 3.07 | 2.86 | 0.21 | Sudan |
| 1960s | 2.84 | 2.68 | 0.16 | Sudan |
| 1970s | 2.67 | 2.55 | 0.12 | Sudan |
| 1980s | 2.62 | 2.38 | 0.24 | Sudan |
| 1990s | 2.57 | 2.43 | 0.14 | Sudan |
| 2000s | 2.43 | 2.63 | 0.2 | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 2.33 | 2.32 | 0.01 | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher replacement fertility rate, Sudan or Zimbabwe?
- Sudan, at 2.33 against 2.32 in Zimbabwe as of 2010.
- What is the difference in replacement fertility rate between Sudan and Zimbabwe?
- 0.01, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sudan and Zimbabwe?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2010.
- How do Sudan and Zimbabwe rank globally for replacement fertility rate?
- Sudan ranks 33rd and Zimbabwe ranks 34th of 199 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Replacement fertility rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.