Belarus vs Sweden: Total fertility rate vs cohort fertility rate vs tempo adjusted tfr
Belarus
1.45
in 2018
Sweden
1.43
in 2024
Belarus rank
19th
Sweden rank
21st
Total fertility rate vs cohort fertility rate vs tempo adjusted tfr over time
- Belarus
- Sweden
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 1.45 against 1.43 in Sweden, a difference of 0.02.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1964 it was Sweden ahead.
Belarus ranks 19th and Sweden ranks 21st of 34 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 3 and Sweden in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2.29 | 2.25 | 0.0332 | Belarus |
| 1970s | 2.19 | 1.79 | 0.4032 | Belarus |
| 1980s | 2.07 | 1.76 | 0.3115 | Belarus |
| 1990s | 1.52 | 1.81 | 0.2837 | Sweden |
| 2000s | 1.33 | 1.77 | 0.4381 | Sweden |
| 2010s | 1.6 | 1.87 | 0.2618 | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total fertility rate vs cohort fertility rate vs tempo adjusted tfr, Belarus or Sweden?
- Belarus, at 1.45 against 1.43 in Sweden as of 2018.
- What is the difference in total fertility rate vs cohort fertility rate vs tempo adjusted tfr between Belarus and Sweden?
- 0.02, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Sweden?
- 55 years are reported by both, from 1964 to 2018.
- How do Belarus and Sweden rank globally for total fertility rate vs cohort fertility rate vs tempo adjusted tfr?
- Belarus ranks 19th and Sweden ranks 21st of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Total fertility rate vs cohort fertility rate vs tempo adjusted tfr. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.