Total fertility rate vs cohort fertility rate vs tempo adjusted tfr in Sweden
Sweden: Total fertility rate vs cohort fertility rate vs tempo adjusted tfr was 1.43 in 2024. ▼ Falling
Latest (2024)
1.43
Change on year
down 1.4%
World rank
21st
of 34 countries
All-time high
4.14
in 1891
All-time low
1.43
in 2024
Years of data
134
1891–2024
Total fertility rate vs cohort fertility rate vs tempo adjusted tfr in Sweden, 1891–2024
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
The most recent figure for total fertility rate vs cohort fertility rate vs tempo adjusted tfr in Sweden is 1.43, measured in 2024. That is the lowest value across all 134 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 1.4% on the previous year and down 23.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, total fertility rate vs cohort fertility rate vs tempo adjusted tfr in Sweden peaked at 4.14 in 1891 and was at its lowest, 1.43, in 2024.
That places Sweden 21st out of 34 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 134 years of available data.
Total fertility rate vs cohort fertility rate vs tempo adjusted tfr in Sweden, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1891 | 4.14 | — |
| 1892 | 3.97 | -4.2% |
| 1893 | 4.04 | +1.8% |
| 1894 | 4.02 | -0.5% |
| 1895 | 4.08 | +1.6% |
| 1896 | 4.05 | -0.9% |
| 1897 | 3.98 | -1.8% |
| 1898 | 4.04 | +1.7% |
| 1899 | 3.93 | -2.8% |
| 1900 | 4.01 | +2.1% |
| 1901 | 4.01 | -0.1% |
| 1902 | 3.93 | -2.1% |
| 1903 | 3.81 | -2.9% |
| 1904 | 3.81 | +0.1% |
| 1905 | 3.8 | -0.5% |
| 1906 | 3.79 | -0.2% |
| 1907 | 3.75 | -1.0% |
| 1908 | 3.75 | +0.1% |
| 1909 | 3.73 | -0.7% |
| 1910 | 3.57 | -4.2% |
| 1911 | 3.45 | -3.4% |
| 1912 | 3.4 | -1.4% |
| 1913 | 3.29 | -3.3% |
| 1914 | 3.23 | -1.9% |
| 1915 | 3.03 | -6.1% |
| 1916 | 2.96 | -2.4% |
| 1917 | 2.9 | -2.0% |
| 1918 | 2.8 | -3.3% |
| 1919 | 2.71 | -3.5% |
| 1920 | 3.2 | +18.2% |
| 1921 | 2.9 | -9.3% |
| 1922 | 2.63 | -9.4% |
| 1923 | 2.52 | -4.0% |
| 1924 | 2.4 | -4.9% |
| 1925 | 2.31 | -3.8% |
| 1926 | 2.19 | -5.0% |
| 1927 | 2.08 | -5.2% |
| 1928 | 2.05 | -1.3% |
| 1929 | 1.93 | -6.2% |
| 1930 | 1.93 | +0.3% |
| 1931 | 1.85 | -4.4% |
| 1932 | 1.8 | -2.6% |
| 1933 | 1.69 | -6.2% |
| 1934 | 1.68 | -0.7% |
| 1935 | 1.68 | +0.0% |
| 1936 | 1.73 | +3.0% |
| 1937 | 1.75 | +1.1% |
| 1938 | 1.8 | +3.4% |
| 1939 | 1.86 | +3.2% |
| 1940 | 1.82 | -2.0% |
| 1941 | 1.89 | +3.8% |
| 1942 | 2.16 | +14.2% |
| 1943 | 2.38 | +10.1% |
| 1944 | 2.57 | +7.9% |
| 1945 | 2.59 | +0.7% |
| 1946 | 2.54 | -1.7% |
| 1947 | 2.48 | -2.4% |
| 1948 | 2.45 | -1.1% |
| 1949 | 2.37 | -3.5% |
| 1950 | 2.28 | -3.8% |
| 1951 | 2.2 | -3.6% |
| 1952 | 2.23 | +1.2% |
| 1953 | 2.25 | +1.3% |
| 1954 | 2.18 | -3.3% |
| 1955 | 2.25 | +3.3% |
| 1956 | 2.29 | +1.5% |
| 1957 | 2.28 | -0.1% |
| 1958 | 2.26 | -1.0% |
| 1959 | 2.25 | -0.3% |
| 1960 | 2.2 | -2.5% |
| 1961 | 2.23 | +1.5% |
| 1962 | 2.26 | +1.2% |
| 1963 | 2.34 | +3.5% |
| 1964 | 2.48 | +6.3% |
| 1965 | 2.42 | -2.7% |
| 1966 | 2.36 | -2.3% |
| 1967 | 2.27 | -4.0% |
| 1968 | 2.07 | -8.6% |
| 1969 | 1.93 | -7.0% |
| 1970 | 1.92 | -0.4% |
| 1971 | 1.96 | +2.1% |
| 1972 | 1.91 | -2.4% |
| 1973 | 1.87 | -2.4% |
| 1974 | 1.88 | +0.5% |
| 1975 | 1.77 | -5.7% |
| 1976 | 1.68 | -4.9% |
| 1977 | 1.65 | -2.2% |
| 1978 | 1.6 | -2.7% |
| 1979 | 1.66 | +3.6% |
| 1980 | 1.68 | +1.3% |
| 1981 | 1.64 | -2.6% |
| 1982 | 1.63 | -0.6% |
| 1983 | 1.61 | -0.8% |
| 1984 | 1.66 | +2.7% |
| 1985 | 1.74 | +4.9% |
| 1986 | 1.8 | +3.4% |
| 1987 | 1.84 | +2.4% |
| 1988 | 1.97 | +6.7% |
| 1989 | 2.02 | +2.7% |
| 1990 | 2.14 | +5.9% |
| 1991 | 2.11 | -1.3% |
| 1992 | 2.08 | -1.7% |
| 1993 | 1.98 | -4.6% |
| 1994 | 1.88 | -5.0% |
| 1995 | 1.73 | -8.1% |
| 1996 | 1.6 | -7.6% |
| 1997 | 1.53 | -4.5% |
| 1998 | 1.52 | -0.7% |
| 1999 | 1.51 | -0.3% |
| 2000 | 1.56 | +3.1% |
| 2001 | 1.58 | +1.3% |
| 2002 | 1.67 | +5.4% |
| 2003 | 1.73 | +4.0% |
| 2004 | 1.77 | +2.3% |
| 2005 | 1.79 | +0.9% |
| 2006 | 1.87 | +4.6% |
| 2007 | 1.89 | +1.2% |
| 2008 | 1.92 | +1.3% |
| 2009 | 1.94 | +1.0% |
| 2010 | 1.99 | +2.6% |
| 2011 | 1.9 | -4.4% |
| 2012 | 1.91 | +0.3% |
| 2013 | 1.89 | -0.9% |
| 2014 | 1.88 | -0.4% |
| 2015 | 1.85 | -1.7% |
| 2016 | 1.85 | +0.3% |
| 2017 | 1.78 | -3.7% |
| 2018 | 1.76 | -1.6% |
| 2019 | 1.71 | -2.6% |
| 2020 | 1.67 | -2.4% |
| 2021 | 1.67 | +0.2% |
| 2022 | 1.52 | -8.8% |
| 2023 | 1.45 | -4.7% |
| 2024 | 1.43 | -1.4% |
Sweden compared with similar countries
- Sweden's 1.43 is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 1.48, 97% of the median. (28 countries reporting)
- Sweden's 1.43 is below the median for high income countries, which is 1.47, 98% of the median. (31 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 4.03 | 3.93 | 4.14 | 9 |
| 1900s | 3.84 | 3.73 | 4.01 | 10 |
| 1910s | 3.13 | 2.71 | 3.57 | 10 |
| 1920s | 2.42 | 1.93 | 3.2 | 10 |
| 1930s | 1.78 | 1.68 | 1.93 | 10 |
| 1940s | 2.33 | 1.82 | 2.59 | 10 |
| 1950s | 2.25 | 2.18 | 2.29 | 10 |
| 1960s | 2.25 | 1.93 | 2.48 | 10 |
| 1970s | 1.79 | 1.6 | 1.96 | 10 |
| 1980s | 1.76 | 1.61 | 2.02 | 10 |
| 1990s | 1.81 | 1.51 | 2.14 | 10 |
| 2000s | 1.77 | 1.56 | 1.94 | 10 |
| 2010s | 1.85 | 1.71 | 1.99 | 10 |
| 2020s | 1.55 | 1.43 | 1.67 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Sweden
More population data for Sweden
- Population regions with projections, annual growth rate -0.0422 % change on previous year (2100)
- Urban and rural population 2050, annual growth rate -0.7238 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population long run with projections, annual growth rate -0.0422 % change on previous year (2100)
- Un population 2024 vs 2022, annual growth rate 0.1458 % change on previous year (2100)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 05 - Demographic estimates 11,902 Persons (2050)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 03 - Annual population 0.4642 Percent per annum (2030)
- Projected population under age 5, annual growth rate 0.1484 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population growth rate -0.051 (2100)
- Population density 27.91 (2100)
- Projected population under age 5 479,660 (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is total fertility rate vs cohort fertility rate vs tempo adjusted tfr in Sweden?
- Total fertility rate vs cohort fertility rate vs tempo adjusted tfr in Sweden was 1.43 in 2024, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest total fertility rate vs cohort fertility rate vs tempo adjusted tfr recorded in Sweden?
- The highest recorded value was 4.14 in 1891.
- What is the lowest total fertility rate vs cohort fertility rate vs tempo adjusted tfr recorded in Sweden?
- The lowest recorded value was 1.43 in 2024.
- How does Sweden rank for total fertility rate vs cohort fertility rate vs tempo adjusted tfr?
- Sweden ranks 21st out of 34 countries with data for 2024.
- Is total fertility rate vs cohort fertility rate vs tempo adjusted tfr rising or falling in Sweden?
- Over the last ten years it is down 23.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Sweden data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Total fertility rate vs cohort fertility rate vs tempo adjusted tfr. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 134 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).