Population density in Hungary
Hungary: Population density was 81.75 in 2100. ▲ Rising
Population density in Hungary, 1000–2100
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
In 2100, population density in Hungary stood at 81.75.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 0.2% on the previous year and down 2.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, population density in Hungary peaked at 117.2 in 1980 and was at its lowest, 5.48, in 1000.
Hungary ranks 135th of 235 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 318 years of available data.
Population density in Hungary, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1000 | 5.48 | — |
| 1100 | 6.57 | +20.0% |
| 1200 | 8.77 | +33.3% |
| 1300 | 13.7 | +56.2% |
| 1400 | 10.96 | -20.0% |
| 1500 | 13.7 | +25.0% |
| 1600 | 13.7 | +0.0% |
| 1700 | 16.44 | +20.0% |
| 1710 | 18.21 | +10.8% |
| 1720 | 19.98 | +9.7% |
| 1730 | 21.76 | +8.9% |
| 1740 | 23.53 | +8.2% |
| 1750 | 25.31 | +7.5% |
| 1760 | 27.08 | +7.0% |
| 1770 | 28.86 | +6.6% |
| 1780 | 30.63 | +6.1% |
| 1790 | 32.4 | +5.8% |
| 1800 | 35.61 | +9.9% |
| 1801 | 36.05 | +1.2% |
| 1802 | 36.49 | +1.2% |
| 1803 | 36.94 | +1.2% |
| 1804 | 37.39 | +1.2% |
| 1805 | 37.85 | +1.2% |
| 1806 | 38.31 | +1.2% |
| 1807 | 38.78 | +1.2% |
| 1808 | 39.26 | +1.2% |
| 1809 | 39.74 | +1.2% |
| 1810 | 40.23 | +1.2% |
| 1811 | 40.72 | +1.2% |
| 1812 | 41.22 | +1.2% |
| 1813 | 41.73 | +1.2% |
| 1814 | 42.24 | +1.2% |
| 1815 | 42.75 | +1.2% |
| 1816 | 43.28 | +1.2% |
| 1817 | 43.81 | +1.2% |
| 1818 | 44.34 | +1.2% |
| 1819 | 44.84 | +1.1% |
| 1820 | 45.3 | +1.0% |
| 1821 | 45.72 | +0.9% |
| 1822 | 46.1 | +0.8% |
| 1823 | 46.44 | +0.7% |
| 1824 | 46.78 | +0.7% |
| 1825 | 47.12 | +0.7% |
| 1826 | 47.47 | +0.7% |
| 1827 | 47.81 | +0.7% |
| 1828 | 48.17 | +0.7% |
| 1829 | 48.52 | +0.7% |
| 1830 | 48.87 | +0.7% |
| 1831 | 49.23 | +0.7% |
| 1832 | 49.59 | +0.7% |
| 1833 | 49.96 | +0.7% |
| 1834 | 50.32 | +0.7% |
| 1835 | 50.69 | +0.7% |
| 1836 | 51.06 | +0.7% |
| 1837 | 51.44 | +0.7% |
| 1838 | 51.81 | +0.7% |
| 1839 | 52.19 | +0.7% |
| 1840 | 52.57 | +0.7% |
| 1841 | 52.96 | +0.7% |
| 1842 | 53.35 | +0.7% |
| 1843 | 53.74 | +0.7% |
| 1844 | 54.13 | +0.7% |
| 1845 | 54.53 | +0.7% |
| 1846 | 54.93 | +0.7% |
| 1847 | 55.33 | +0.7% |
| 1848 | 55.74 | +0.7% |
| 1849 | 56.14 | +0.7% |
| 1850 | 56.54 | +0.7% |
| 1851 | 56.93 | +0.7% |
| 1852 | 57.33 | +0.7% |
| 1853 | 57.72 | +0.7% |
| 1854 | 58.11 | +0.7% |
| 1855 | 58.51 | +0.7% |
| 1856 | 58.9 | +0.7% |
| 1857 | 59.3 | +0.7% |
| 1858 | 59.71 | +0.7% |
| 1859 | 60.11 | +0.7% |
| 1860 | 60.52 | +0.7% |
| 1861 | 60.93 | +0.7% |
| 1862 | 61.35 | +0.7% |
| 1863 | 61.77 | +0.7% |
| 1864 | 62.19 | +0.7% |
| 1865 | 62.61 | +0.7% |
| 1866 | 63.03 | +0.7% |
| 1867 | 63.46 | +0.7% |
| 1868 | 63.9 | +0.7% |
| 1869 | 64.31 | +0.7% |
| 1870 | 64.72 | +0.6% |
| 1871 | 65.11 | +0.6% |
| 1872 | 65.49 | +0.6% |
| 1873 | 65.86 | +0.6% |
| 1874 | 66.23 | +0.6% |
| 1875 | 66.6 | +0.6% |
| 1876 | 66.97 | +0.6% |
| 1877 | 67.34 | +0.6% |
| 1878 | 67.72 | +0.6% |
| 1879 | 68.1 | +0.6% |
| 1880 | 68.48 | +0.6% |
| 1881 | 68.86 | +0.6% |
| 1882 | 69.25 | +0.6% |
| 1883 | 69.63 | +0.6% |
| 1884 | 70.02 | +0.6% |
| 1885 | 70.41 | +0.6% |
| 1886 | 70.81 | +0.6% |
| 1887 | 71.2 | +0.6% |
| 1888 | 71.6 | +0.6% |
| 1889 | 72.03 | +0.6% |
| 1890 | 72.48 | +0.6% |
| 1891 | 72.96 | +0.7% |
| 1892 | 73.47 | +0.7% |
| 1893 | 74.01 | +0.7% |
| 1894 | 74.55 | +0.7% |
| 1895 | 75.09 | +0.7% |
| 1896 | 75.64 | +0.7% |
| 1897 | 76.2 | +0.7% |
| 1898 | 76.75 | +0.7% |
| 1899 | 77.31 | +0.7% |
| 1900 | 77.87 | +0.7% |
| 1901 | 78.42 | +0.7% |
| 1902 | 78.97 | +0.7% |
| 1903 | 79.52 | +0.7% |
| 1904 | 80.08 | +0.7% |
| 1905 | 80.64 | +0.7% |
| 1906 | 81.2 | +0.7% |
| 1907 | 81.76 | +0.7% |
| 1908 | 82.33 | +0.7% |
| 1909 | 82.86 | +0.6% |
| 1910 | 83.33 | +0.6% |
| 1911 | 83.76 | +0.5% |
| 1912 | 84.13 | +0.4% |
| 1913 | 84.46 | +0.4% |
| 1914 | 84.78 | +0.4% |
| 1915 | 85.11 | +0.4% |
| 1916 | 85.44 | +0.4% |
| 1917 | 85.77 | +0.4% |
| 1918 | 86.11 | +0.4% |
| 1919 | 86.53 | +0.5% |
| 1920 | 87.03 | +0.6% |
| 1921 | 87.61 | +0.7% |
| 1922 | 88.27 | +0.8% |
| 1923 | 89.02 | +0.8% |
| 1924 | 89.77 | +0.8% |
| 1925 | 90.53 | +0.8% |
| 1926 | 91.3 | +0.8% |
| 1927 | 92.07 | +0.8% |
| 1928 | 92.85 | +0.8% |
| 1929 | 93.61 | +0.8% |
| 1930 | 94.35 | +0.8% |
| 1931 | 95.08 | +0.8% |
| 1932 | 95.78 | +0.7% |
| 1933 | 96.46 | +0.7% |
| 1934 | 97.15 | +0.7% |
| 1935 | 97.85 | +0.7% |
| 1936 | 98.54 | +0.7% |
| 1937 | 99.25 | +0.7% |
| 1938 | 99.96 | +0.7% |
| 1939 | 100.54 | +0.6% |
| 1940 | 100.99 | +0.4% |
| 1941 | 101.31 | +0.3% |
| 1942 | 101.5 | +0.2% |
| 1943 | 101.55 | +0.1% |
| 1944 | 101.61 | +0.1% |
| 1945 | 101.66 | +0.1% |
| 1946 | 101.72 | +0.1% |
| 1947 | 101.78 | +0.1% |
| 1948 | 101.83 | +0.1% |
| 1949 | 102.01 | +0.2% |
| 1950 | 102.32 | +0.3% |
| 1951 | 103.26 | +0.9% |
| 1952 | 104.14 | +0.9% |
| 1953 | 105.13 | +1.0% |
| 1954 | 106.34 | +1.1% |
| 1955 | 107.64 | +1.2% |
| 1956 | 107.98 | +0.3% |
| 1957 | 107.8 | -0.2% |
| 1958 | 108.27 | +0.4% |
| 1959 | 108.89 | +0.6% |
| 1960 | 109.39 | +0.5% |
| 1961 | 109.87 | +0.4% |
| 1962 | 110.21 | +0.3% |
| 1963 | 110.5 | +0.3% |
| 1964 | 110.83 | +0.3% |
| 1965 | 111.12 | +0.3% |
| 1966 | 111.44 | +0.3% |
| 1967 | 111.84 | +0.4% |
| 1968 | 112.26 | +0.4% |
| 1969 | 112.66 | +0.4% |
| 1970 | 113.03 | +0.3% |
| 1971 | 113.35 | +0.3% |
| 1972 | 113.68 | +0.3% |
| 1973 | 114.04 | +0.3% |
| 1974 | 114.55 | +0.4% |
| 1975 | 115.23 | +0.6% |
| 1976 | 115.86 | +0.6% |
| 1977 | 116.41 | +0.5% |
| 1978 | 116.81 | +0.3% |
| 1979 | 117.12 | +0.3% |
| 1980 | 117.2 | +0.1% |
| 1981 | 117.02 | -0.2% |
| 1982 | 116.77 | -0.2% |
| 1983 | 116.4 | -0.3% |
| 1984 | 115.98 | -0.4% |
| 1985 | 115.57 | -0.4% |
| 1986 | 115.18 | -0.3% |
| 1987 | 114.78 | -0.3% |
| 1988 | 114.4 | -0.3% |
| 1989 | 114 | -0.4% |
| 1990 | 113.75 | -0.2% |
| 1991 | 113.72 | -0.0% |
| 1992 | 113.65 | -0.1% |
| 1993 | 113.49 | -0.1% |
| 1994 | 113.3 | -0.2% |
| 1995 | 113.11 | -0.2% |
| 1996 | 112.89 | -0.2% |
| 1997 | 112.63 | -0.2% |
| 1998 | 112.33 | -0.3% |
| 1999 | 111.99 | -0.3% |
| 2000 | 111.67 | -0.3% |
| 2001 | 111.4 | -0.2% |
| 2002 | 111.09 | -0.3% |
| 2003 | 110.77 | -0.3% |
| 2004 | 110.52 | -0.2% |
| 2005 | 110.3 | -0.2% |
| 2006 | 110.12 | -0.2% |
| 2007 | 109.95 | -0.2% |
| 2008 | 109.76 | -0.2% |
| 2009 | 109.59 | -0.2% |
| 2010 | 109.35 | -0.2% |
| 2011 | 108.99 | -0.3% |
| 2012 | 108.66 | -0.3% |
| 2013 | 108.36 | -0.3% |
| 2014 | 108.07 | -0.3% |
| 2015 | 107.81 | -0.2% |
| 2016 | 107.5 | -0.3% |
| 2017 | 107.23 | -0.3% |
| 2018 | 107.11 | -0.1% |
| 2019 | 107.06 | -0.0% |
| 2020 | 106.83 | -0.2% |
| 2021 | 106.38 | -0.4% |
| 2022 | 106.12 | -0.2% |
| 2023 | 106.14 | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 106.03 | -0.1% |
| 2025 | 105.55 | -0.5% |
| 2026 | 105.04 | -0.5% |
| 2027 | 104.68 | -0.3% |
| 2028 | 104.32 | -0.3% |
| 2029 | 103.94 | -0.4% |
| 2030 | 103.54 | -0.4% |
| 2031 | 103.14 | -0.4% |
| 2032 | 102.73 | -0.4% |
| 2033 | 102.31 | -0.4% |
| 2034 | 101.89 | -0.4% |
| 2035 | 101.47 | -0.4% |
| 2036 | 101.04 | -0.4% |
| 2037 | 100.62 | -0.4% |
| 2038 | 100.19 | -0.4% |
| 2039 | 99.77 | -0.4% |
| 2040 | 99.36 | -0.4% |
| 2041 | 98.95 | -0.4% |
| 2042 | 98.56 | -0.4% |
| 2043 | 98.17 | -0.4% |
| 2044 | 97.78 | -0.4% |
| 2045 | 97.41 | -0.4% |
| 2046 | 97.03 | -0.4% |
| 2047 | 96.67 | -0.4% |
| 2048 | 96.31 | -0.4% |
| 2049 | 95.96 | -0.4% |
| 2050 | 95.61 | -0.4% |
| 2051 | 95.27 | -0.4% |
| 2052 | 94.92 | -0.4% |
| 2053 | 94.58 | -0.4% |
| 2054 | 94.23 | -0.4% |
| 2055 | 93.88 | -0.4% |
| 2056 | 93.52 | -0.4% |
| 2057 | 93.15 | -0.4% |
| 2058 | 92.78 | -0.4% |
| 2059 | 92.41 | -0.4% |
| 2060 | 92.02 | -0.4% |
| 2061 | 91.63 | -0.4% |
| 2062 | 91.23 | -0.4% |
| 2063 | 90.83 | -0.4% |
| 2064 | 90.43 | -0.4% |
| 2065 | 90.02 | -0.4% |
| 2066 | 89.62 | -0.4% |
| 2067 | 89.24 | -0.4% |
| 2068 | 88.86 | -0.4% |
| 2069 | 88.49 | -0.4% |
| 2070 | 88.12 | -0.4% |
| 2071 | 87.78 | -0.4% |
| 2072 | 87.44 | -0.4% |
| 2073 | 87.12 | -0.4% |
| 2074 | 86.82 | -0.3% |
| 2075 | 86.53 | -0.3% |
| 2076 | 86.26 | -0.3% |
| 2077 | 86 | -0.3% |
| 2078 | 85.76 | -0.3% |
| 2079 | 85.53 | -0.3% |
| 2080 | 85.3 | -0.3% |
| 2081 | 85.09 | -0.3% |
| 2082 | 84.88 | -0.2% |
| 2083 | 84.68 | -0.2% |
| 2084 | 84.49 | -0.2% |
| 2085 | 84.3 | -0.2% |
| 2086 | 84.11 | -0.2% |
| 2087 | 83.93 | -0.2% |
| 2088 | 83.75 | -0.2% |
| 2089 | 83.58 | -0.2% |
| 2090 | 83.41 | -0.2% |
| 2091 | 83.25 | -0.2% |
| 2092 | 83.08 | -0.2% |
| 2093 | 82.92 | -0.2% |
| 2094 | 82.75 | -0.2% |
| 2095 | 82.59 | -0.2% |
| 2096 | 82.43 | -0.2% |
| 2097 | 82.27 | -0.2% |
| 2098 | 82.1 | -0.2% |
| 2099 | 81.93 | -0.2% |
| 2100 | 81.75 | -0.2% |
Hungary compared with similar countries
- Hungary's 81.75 is below the median for high income countries, which is 106.6, 77% of the median. (85 countries reporting)
- Hungary's 81.75 is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 64.72, 1.3× the median. (56 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Population density in Hungary changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1300 | +56.2% | 8.77 | 13.7 |
| 1200 | +33.3% | 6.57 | 8.77 |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1000s | 5.48 | 5.48 | 5.48 | 1 |
| 1100s | 6.57 | 6.57 | 6.57 | 1 |
| 1200s | 8.77 | 8.77 | 8.77 | 1 |
| 1300s | 13.7 | 13.7 | 13.7 | 1 |
| 1400s | 10.96 | 10.96 | 10.96 | 1 |
| 1500s | 13.7 | 13.7 | 13.7 | 1 |
| 1600s | 13.7 | 13.7 | 13.7 | 1 |
| 1700s | 16.44 | 16.44 | 16.44 | 1 |
| 1710s | 18.21 | 18.21 | 18.21 | 1 |
| 1720s | 19.98 | 19.98 | 19.98 | 1 |
| 1730s | 21.76 | 21.76 | 21.76 | 1 |
| 1740s | 23.53 | 23.53 | 23.53 | 1 |
| 1750s | 25.31 | 25.31 | 25.31 | 1 |
| 1760s | 27.08 | 27.08 | 27.08 | 1 |
| 1770s | 28.86 | 28.86 | 28.86 | 1 |
| 1780s | 30.63 | 30.63 | 30.63 | 1 |
| 1790s | 32.4 | 32.4 | 32.4 | 1 |
| 1800s | 37.64 | 35.61 | 39.74 | 10 |
| 1810s | 42.52 | 40.23 | 44.84 | 10 |
| 1820s | 46.94 | 45.3 | 48.52 | 10 |
| 1830s | 50.52 | 48.87 | 52.19 | 10 |
| 1840s | 54.34 | 52.57 | 56.14 | 10 |
| 1850s | 58.32 | 56.54 | 60.11 | 10 |
| 1860s | 62.41 | 60.52 | 64.31 | 10 |
| 1870s | 66.41 | 64.72 | 68.1 | 10 |
| 1880s | 70.23 | 68.48 | 72.03 | 10 |
| 1890s | 74.85 | 72.48 | 77.31 | 10 |
| 1900s | 80.36 | 77.87 | 82.86 | 10 |
| 1910s | 84.94 | 83.33 | 86.53 | 10 |
| 1920s | 90.21 | 87.03 | 93.61 | 10 |
| 1930s | 97.5 | 94.35 | 100.54 | 10 |
| 1940s | 101.6 | 100.99 | 102.01 | 10 |
| 1950s | 106.18 | 102.32 | 108.89 | 10 |
| 1960s | 111.01 | 109.39 | 112.66 | 10 |
| 1970s | 115.01 | 113.03 | 117.12 | 10 |
| 1980s | 115.73 | 114 | 117.2 | 10 |
| 1990s | 113.09 | 111.99 | 113.75 | 10 |
| 2000s | 110.52 | 109.59 | 111.67 | 10 |
| 2010s | 108.02 | 107.06 | 109.35 | 10 |
| 2020s | 105.5 | 103.94 | 106.83 | 10 |
| 2030s | 101.67 | 99.77 | 103.54 | 10 |
| 2040s | 97.62 | 95.96 | 99.36 | 10 |
| 2050s | 94.03 | 92.41 | 95.61 | 10 |
| 2060s | 90.24 | 88.49 | 92.02 | 10 |
| 2070s | 86.74 | 85.53 | 88.12 | 10 |
| 2080s | 84.41 | 83.58 | 85.3 | 10 |
| 2090s | 82.67 | 81.93 | 83.41 | 10 |
| 2100s | 81.75 | 81.75 | 81.75 | 1 |
Countries ranked near Hungary
More population data for Hungary
- Population regions with projections, annual growth rate -0.2145 % change on previous year (2100)
- Urban and rural population 2050, annual growth rate -1.97 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population long run with projections, annual growth rate -0.2145 % change on previous year (2100)
- Un population 2024 vs 2022, annual growth rate -0.3612 % change on previous year (2100)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 05 - Demographic estimates 8,817 Persons (2050)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 03 - Annual population -0.335 Percent per annum (2030)
- Projected population under age 5, annual growth rate -0.3021 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population growth rate -0.215 (2100)
- Projected population under age 5 324,096 (2100)
- Population growth rate by level of development -0.215 (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is population density in Hungary?
- Population density in Hungary was 81.75 in 2100, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest population density recorded in Hungary?
- The highest recorded value was 117.2 in 1980.
- What is the lowest population density recorded in Hungary?
- The lowest recorded value was 5.48 in 1000.
- How does Hungary rank for population density?
- Hungary ranks 135th out of 235 countries with data for 2100.
- Is population density rising or falling in Hungary?
- Over the last ten years it is down 2.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Hungary data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Population density. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 318 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).