Iraq vs Nepal: Replacement-level fertility rate
Iraq
2.19
in 2010
Nepal
2.19
in 2010
Iraq rank
62nd
Nepal rank
62nd
Replacement-level fertility rate over time
- Iraq
- Nepal
How they compare
Iraq currently reports 2.19 against 2.19 in Nepal, a difference of 0.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Nepal has been ahead every year.
Iraq ranks 62nd and Nepal ranks 62nd of 199 countries.
Nepal has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iraq | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 3.55 | 3.92 | 0.37 | Nepal |
| 1960s | 2.83 | 3.72 | 0.89 | Nepal |
| 1970s | 2.48 | 3.25 | 0.77 | Nepal |
| 1980s | 2.29 | 2.87 | 0.58 | Nepal |
| 1990s | 2.22 | 2.53 | 0.31 | Nepal |
| 2000s | 2.2 | 2.31 | 0.11 | Nepal |
| 2010s | 2.19 | 2.19 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher replacement-level fertility rate, Iraq or Nepal?
- Iraq, at 2.19 against 2.19 in Nepal as of 2010.
- What is the difference in replacement-level fertility rate between Iraq and Nepal?
- 0, with Iraq ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iraq and Nepal?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2010.
- How do Iraq and Nepal rank globally for replacement-level fertility rate?
- Iraq ranks 62nd and Nepal ranks 62nd of 199 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Gietel-Basten and Scherbov (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Replacement-level fertility rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The replacement-level fertility rate (the total fertility rate needed to keep the population size stable over time, without migration) is commonly stated to be 2.1. But the level can vary based on the sex ratio, child mortality rates, and other factors.